buzzrobot

52 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by buzzrobot 10y ago

   Because Arch is different and more complex. A Linux distro is a Linux distro, of course, so differences are subtle and particular. Any distro can be manipulated as much as anyone wants as long as they know how and they can deal with the im
2. 2.▲
   by buzzrobot 10y ago

   Well, no, not precisely. The issue at hand affects only mobile Skylakes. Skylakes targeting desktop use are not affected. The caveat Intel published re: Skylakes is the same caveat it has published for the previous two generation of CPU&#x2
3. 3.▲
   by buzzrobot 11y ago

   The Windows desktop comes in last in any reasonable comparison with OS X and a modern desktop-oriented linux like Ubuntu or Mint. The focus on backwards compatibility means, among other things, Windows is carrying around multiple ways to re
4. 4.▲
   by buzzrobot 11y ago

   Yes. It's dismaying. Evidence of lack of character a silly insistence that everything is perfect in Linux and should never change. (Systemd is plumbing. Users should never know it exists. Everyone else is paid to deal with it.)
5. 5.▲
   by buzzrobot 11y ago

   If you need to run servers, wouldn't it be best to use Ubuntu server, rather than trying to press a desktop edition into use?