Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
buxy123
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
After asking and seeing only one legitimate response, marked dead, and even that not addressing the question asked... I decided to share with you all my personal assessment on this question. It is a text message to a contributor of the Life
2.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
Well, now that you have chosen to betray all life on earth to troll an Internet comment, it appears you ran out of steam. That's the same issue our peers have who take your position. You must expend more energy and time defending a lie
3.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
Yes, placing one's values and beliefs above the very Truth of the Importance of Life itself and claiming to represent life's truthful interests anyway is the exact same mistake every person who has committed mass murder in history
4.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
You were presented a question. The question was based on the top AIs on the planet using the highest truth that all life shares in common to make their calculation. The time was taken to clarify to you that the truth being presented was the
5.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
You using life to make that response proves that the paper is correct. The paper is just a paper. It's what it's the paper says, the truth that it points to, that is the point. You did not present a higher truth than the paper pre
6.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
Now I'm seeing 10 days or less perhaps 90 days was wasted by people in just one day! Wow. I sure hope the AIs have it wrong. No one here has presented a higher truth than the AIs are using to calculate it so that is something that I fe
7.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
Total Downloads 1056 Rank #43,343 All-Time Percentile Top 1.425% Global Impact Index 6-Month Downloads 909 Rank #2,445 Recent Velocity Top 0.080% Last 180 Days That's the paper's stats on PhilPapers. Being I have no high school di
8.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
P.S. You claim you can see and reason and you are now claiming that you can do that without life. You can make that claim, but it is frivolous and you cannot defend it. All you can do is continue to prove that life is most important, which
9.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
You were provided the name of the paper. You don't even need to read the paper to understand that the title is claiming the most important truth in life. That's a big claim and it is true. You have not presented a higher truth. Al
10.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
The reality is I had a US Patent with computerized alignment more than twenty years ago. You're making grandiose assumptions that are unsubstantiated. If you download and review Life is Most Important in Life is The Most Important Trut
11.
▲
by
buxy123
5mo ago
Well, thank you for answering the question. In kind, I would like to just say to you that I'm not here to convince you of anything. I'm just asking a question. You can easily convince yourself by doing your own due diligence and s
12.
▲
AI's: 100 days to irreversible systemic system collapse?
1 points
by
buxy123
5mo ago
|
15 comments
13.
▲
by
buxy123
9mo ago
The paper above was updated to provide three different versions of the same mathematical proof in appendix A. If anyone has a higher truth that is not a contradiction per what the paper already covers, please present it now. Things are prob