burgerandfries

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by burgerandfries 7y ago

   If an executive at Google posted memes and personally attacked a rank and file employee, they'd be met with the same pushback. The notion that this was only a problem because it was directed at an executive (or high level employee in g
2. 2.▲
   by burgerandfries 7y ago

   Your suggested title is more misleading than the current title. Not allowing employees to personally attack other employees isn't restricting internal dissent. Employees are free to voice their dissent all they want as long as they kee
3. 3.▲
   by burgerandfries 7y ago

   If your definition of censorship is not allowing employees to use company time and resources to make personal attacks against other employees, then every single company in existence engages in censorship. The fact this article is even news