bundtlake

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bundtlake 2y ago

   For sure, but you’re using test driven development just without writing the tests. (which I do think is a clever) Might as well write the tests, or, as I recommended, generators for your expected input.
2. 2.▲
   by bundtlake 2y ago

   I like the simplicity of your implementation but I would fear overfitting to your example development data. In clojure if youre writing tests, even a quick mock-up, I’d recommend you do so directly using “clojure.test”. Clojure has my favor
3. 3.▲
   by bundtlake 2y ago

   Fun aside. I invented a word in my previous comment: prudist. I think contextually it is apparent what it means, but it is adorned with the dreaded “red squiggly”. Creating new words is a fundamental aspect of what language is. I’ve yet to
4. 4.▲
   by bundtlake 2y ago

   > I doubt you refuse to work with anyone that's read a book that you refused to read. You are correct in your assumption. > You'd probably also agree that while the topic of those books might be objectionable to you there&#x
5. 5.▲
   by bundtlake 2y ago

   They model the rhetoric, semantics, and ideas of some of the most unhinged and immature denizens of the internet. The stolen data used in the training sets are filled with online communities you would shudder to be forced to experience, and