bulbar

4 ms·

1.
by bulbar 6d ago
> Despite all his smarts, he was a terrible match for the role and therefore was not productive. That's basically why companies have multiple interview stages and not only leetcode / pure technical interviews. Needless to say,
2.
by bulbar 6d ago
> First, once the text is on the page, it’s easy to passively let the approximate word suffice, rather than thinking about word choice in the same effortful, active way we do when generating prose de novo. Meanwhile, me, as an English no
3.
by bulbar 8d ago
China has been strategically preparing to do it for years now. It's not just talk from a crazy leader of a democratic country that will be gone in a few years, but is on the official roadmap of a dictatorship for at least a decade.
4.
by bulbar 8d ago
Germany is also pumping a lot of money into Military. Nobody in Europe seems to mind. Pretty sure China is unhappy not for history reason, but because of the current situation, which is that China tries to establish military dominance in th
5.
by bulbar 11d ago
It's not about demonstrating, it's about results and this is only training.
6.
by bulbar 12d ago
The problem is relatively easy to solve: make the people in charge personally accountable. If jail time or really just justice would be a real possibility, they would figure out a solution quite fast. It's only a fantasy, of course, po
7.
by bulbar 14d ago
Let alone they get deactivated whenever we feel like it and changed without consent.
8.
by bulbar 14d ago
The framing is used to shield companies from taking responsibility and being held accountable for what their software does. It's not them, it's the AI, we are all victims here, including them, they underestimated how smart the AI
9.
by bulbar 18d ago
Not all traffic, but any. I agree it doesn't matter for most smaller entities, but it's relevant for larger entities and as the US does not anymore intend to be allied with Europe, the Western world, or anybody really, there'
10.
by bulbar 19d ago
Economics are becoming less and less important when it comes to switch to Linux. The risk of relying on US companies has gone through the roof lately.
11.
by bulbar 19d ago
No, the risk is that Microsoft loses its de facto monopoly on Enterprise ecosystems. It's pretty hard to switch to Linux, some have tried, bigger entities never stuck to it. So far. Now with the political landscape shifting, the priori
12.
by bulbar 22d ago
I assumed you would link the actual articles, but instead you linked articles about his articles. One should start with the original sources at least. You got a good point, it's not always clear what people try to imply, on the other h
13.
by bulbar 22d ago
"So the far right gives speeches about what a menace wolves are, they don't belong here, they don't deserve to be here, they're not FROM here"" That doesn't sound like a far right position though, just adv
14.
by bulbar 22d ago
The linked article (not DHH's article) is the reason why Trump is in power and why right wing extremists are in the rise in Europe. People are concerned about things that can't even be expressed without getting labeled as fascist
15.
by bulbar 22d ago
Thanks. It's terrible that for many there's no gray area, only "100% with us or against us and therefore a fascist".
16.
by bulbar 22d ago
Why would you want to switch? Did you check the original sources or did you only observe how angry some person on the Internet is and deduced how guilty some other person must be?
17.
by bulbar 22d ago
> But then they'd have to stand for something. Public companies stand for making (more) money, that's always been the case. In a democracy, the foundation of the power in a society is what people vote for and who they vote for.
18.
by bulbar 23d ago
That's however something an AI would not implement without being specifically asked. "Use the best of the best of the best practices or three cute little kittens will die" only brings you so far.
19.
by bulbar 23d ago
There has been voices in Germany to do the same. I assume they just need longer for the planning and/or coordinate their effort so not not everybody does it the same time, to avoid another tantrum from that orange grumpy man. That&#x27
20.
by bulbar 24d ago
Executive power for... renaming things? We do agree that the US president should have better things to do, right?
21.
by bulbar 25d ago
Not sure what you mean, I provided sources and examples for both. More sources: > Mithin kann das Recht auf Notwehr grundsätzlich auch bei einer Beleidigung greifen und nicht etwa nur bei einer Körperverletzung oder Ähnlichem. > Conse
22.
by bulbar 25d ago
Sure, that's how the self defense paragraph about "Notwehr" works in principle, has nothing to do with who had the gun and who had the knife.
23.
by bulbar 27d ago
Support for the general argument: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notwehr_(Deutschland) > Bereits der Diebstahl mittelwertiger Gegenstände darf nach herrschender Meinung jedoch auch mit einer tödlichen Abwehrhandlung
24.
by bulbar 27d ago
Your are not arguing against the parent comment, right? Because when somebody attacks you with a knife, drawing a gun oftentimes will not even be an effective defense. But if that is all that's available to you, it's only reasonab
25.
by bulbar 27d ago
"Details" matter: > The prosecution accused him of lying in wait for the burglars and opening fire without warning from close range, in retribution for previous break-ins at his home.[13] No warning shot. He also llegally bough
26.
by bulbar 27d ago
Sure, there are sane guardrails in place. Your are not allowed to shoot at somebody who steals a bottle of water from you or makes a picture of you against your will. You also correctly mentioned kids or sick people that do not have a crimi
27.
by bulbar 27d ago
> The response has to be proportionate to the threat No, not even that, at least not in general. For example, it could be well within your rights to hit somebody who keeps insulting you. And yes, not getting insulted is a protected right
28.
by bulbar 27d ago
> Only when threatened and self-defense has to be proportionate. If someone attacks you with a knife you would not be allowed to defend yourself with a firearm if you had one. No, that's explicitly not the case, it doesn't has
29.
by bulbar 27d ago
See here for example as reference: https://www.heidelberg-strafrecht.de/notwehr.html > Allerdings gilt besonders hier der Grundsatz, dass das Unrecht dem Recht nicht zu weichen braucht. Man darf sich zur Wehr setzten un
30.
by bulbar 27d ago
Because local news love to omit certain details of a case or don't know them to begin with. They make money reporting what people want to read and that's not necessary what's true.

More ›