buellerbueller

5 ms·

61.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Once the data is collected, we can't get it back; it is out there forever. There are other ways to create more security.
62.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Someone should invent something that, used in a confined space, will destroy camera sensors (but not human retinas)
63.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Sometimes, even controversial people are right. Not just the "broken clock is right twice a day" kind of right, but actually right. We should endeavor to separate the message from the messenger, and evaluate the message on its o
64.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Good. Let the techbros understand we don't want a surveillance state.
65.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Before Israel entered Gaza, "from the river to the sea" was an official plank in the likud party platform, the party of Netanyahu. If "from the river to the sea" is genocidal, then Netanyahu's party claimed the rig
66.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
^Propaganda
67.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Could you just be Israel's useful idiot?
68.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Never heard the name of that concept before (though obviously am aware of it). Thanks for enlightening me today!
69.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Israel, who has made itself the standard bearer for and home of Judaism, is behaving reprehensibly. Do they not think that legitimate anti-Israeli-policy sentiment would bleed over into illegitimate anti-semitism, particularly when Israeli
70.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Hell, those folks react in horror at literally quoting the n-word as written in "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn."
71.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Security cameras generally don't change their location.
72.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Let the retirement funds get fucked, and then sue their advisers for allowing them to be invested in Meta. Then, via the seemingly only thing that actually matters: pressure from Wall Street, maybe then, we will get social media to be resp
73.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
I, personally, want more socialists. I think it would be a good thing for people to bear a bit more responsibility to one another in the USA.
74.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
>It takes a village to raise a child. ...is one form of parenting. Maybe some people would prefer other forms.
75.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
>It's ridiculous and unfounded to claim black people are "under-policied". You should try reading the book "Ghettocide." From heavily right-leaning </s> The New Republic: "In this non-fiction mur
76.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
When Flock camera or data center agreements are negotiated in secret with no public input, or are done over the overwhelming rejection by the public, is that not its own "new rule of law"?
77.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Classic jury nullification.
78.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
>Seems these days the only cross-partisan agreement is resistance to Flock and Axon. Also: Don't sell the World Cup to Private Equity.
79.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
What small town is that?
80.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Is fish sauce a toxin?
81.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
To those who are OK with these devices: when you engage in corruption, do you have any moral standing against your politicians when they engage in corruption? Both you, and the corrupt politicians, are eating away at the trust that underpin
82.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
For what it is worth: in the novel, the point of bombing planes is not to get popular support for climate action, but to make it risky enough that people just stop taking planes.
83.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
What if extreme charity is merely sociopathic status signaling?
84.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
This supports my belief that when being a finance bro was the only way to Croesus-level wealth, sociopaths tended to go into finance, so they could transcend societal norms with their wealth. Then, tech came along, making finance bro-level
85.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
Maybe it is a clever play to shine light on the problem? (I doubt, but can't entirely discount, it.)
86.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
I guess if you are really serious about saving the planet from airplanes, you could start a network of similar-feeling folks and begin randomly bombing enough flights to terrify the world into not flying. Give yourself an edgy name, like th
87.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
You claimed twice in as many sentences that all americans are to blame for the way that (some) foreign nationals and undocumented immigrants are treated by the current American government. Does that include the people who are out protesting
88.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
>If one's beliefs align with those who wish to strip civil rights from citizens who are different than one's own, then one is an asshole and doesn't deserve the time of day. Who are you talking about here? This isn't
89.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
If the commenter to whom I was responded made his points about American policy or institutions (rather than all Americans ), I'd wholeheartedly agree, but that isn't what was written. I, personally, don't favor isolationism.
90.
by buellerbueller 2mo ago
1. "most" is debatable 2. "Some" is a superset that includes "most"

More ›