bsenftner

4 ms·

1.
by bsenftner 7d ago
Nope, not Viola–Jones. I'm describing the initial fast test that is a preprocessor to pretty much all facial recognition, before the FR model processes anything. FR models process potential face rectangles, and this method goes after t
2.
by bsenftner 8d ago
Just write, write your own words, then create an effective communication persona within your LLM's non-reasoning (non-Chain-of-Thought) capabilities and have it critique your writing after describing your target audience. Then, write
3.
by bsenftner 8d ago
Which few to none seem to have understood why, and they do not incorporate, composing their requests with implied information any AI must guess what the hell this request is talking about. Look for and replace implied information with expli
4.
by bsenftner 10d ago
Now I want to learn about "Apple Reference Video" and learn how to work with that to create verifiable video for journalists, news, documentary and other non-entertainment forms of media.
5.
by bsenftner 11d ago
No, people with missing eyes and eye patches are in the training data.
6.
by bsenftner 11d ago
Oh, you bring up the 2nd method that defeats facial recognition, and it is a similar exploit that attacks a weakness in the technology chain. Remember "Ed Hardy" that god awful fashion from around 2013 where clothing had graffitti
7.
by bsenftner 12d ago
The existential threat is a general public panic. Then the use of that as an excuse for Martial law, with no intention of ending it, and that triggers the out sized response that ends, well, those countries and their populations from viabil
8.
by bsenftner 12d ago
There is a weak component to facial recognition systems that can be exploited to make one invisible to facial recognition, but you stick out like a sore thumb to people. The exploit is to not have a human face, meaning the regular pattern o
9.
by bsenftner 12d ago
Bingo. And even if you do give it a tool that runs shell commands, you can always make your shell commands "your shell commands" and do what ever the hell you want. People seem to forget we are in complete control here, we are on
10.
by bsenftner 13d ago
Okay, so we know OpenAI and Anthropic are operating a propagandists in respect to how they describe their models and the behavior of those models. We also know it is how they use and frame their use to their models that is the problem, that
11.
by bsenftner 13d ago
Okay, so we know OpenAI and Anthropic are operating a propagandists in respect to how they describe their models and the behavior of those models. We also know it is how they use and frame their use to their models that is the problem, that
12.
by bsenftner 17d ago
Ramanujan was a phenomenon
13.
by bsenftner 17d ago
Only the idle and curious rich
14.
by bsenftner 18d ago
The propaganda police are lying. There is nothing wrong with C/C++, you are just too lazy to handle your own memory, and you accepted that propaganda that "managing your own memory is hard" without even trying. The idea that
15.
by bsenftner 21d ago
Well, you proved you have it with your declaration of my statement as "handwavy". That assessment requires comprehension, so you've got it. To "prove" a person has comprehension, if they "learn" without a
16.
by bsenftner 22d ago
Sure: comprehension is the ability to instantaneously create virtualized simulations of observation, and then decompose them into component parts that simultaneously and instantaneously evaluate each and every one of our observations for bo
17.
by bsenftner 22d ago
Comprehension, humans have it, animals have it in limited form, trained algorithms have none at all. The training process is our wholesale replacement for no artificial comprehension. If we ever develop artificial comprehension, that is A
18.
by bsenftner 23d ago
One of my favorite topics, and one that many people argue exists. The conventional thinker really dislikes this concept, as if it points out some personal flaw of theirs. I mention that only because it really sticks out, the personalized pe
19.
by bsenftner 25d ago
That polarizing take is magnified by our failure to teach how to manage discussions that contain controversy and disagreement. Then there is the fact that most people's idea of debate is some game of dominance and not to find solutions
20.
by bsenftner 25d ago
Wow, you really do not understand them. The 'problem' with LLM AI is the weak educations of the people that cannot grasp their subtle multidimensional nature, and how that creates a requirement on the users' behalf to underst
21.
by bsenftner 27d ago
Do you really want a 20 minute pause in the action, every time a new room or space is encountered, because Tolkien goes on for 2-5 pages describing every new environment like that.
22.
by bsenftner 27d ago
Nobody wants to watch such films, they want to muck with the filmmaker, the generation apparatus. That's the product, if there is one here, and absolutely not the 3 hour epic that's spit out with 4 variations to choose between. Th
23.
by bsenftner 27d ago
The results are boring. Not because the content is boring, but because you can so easily remix the results. Human curation is what creates value with these, not dumping and consuming. A personal perspective of a human being ups the respect,
24.
by bsenftner 28d ago
> It's widely reported on and discussed. You'll find plenty of people saying it isn't one, but I'm sure you can find an economist willing to take any position you like if you look hard enough. Not to mention everyone
25.
by bsenftner 29d ago
Then you're talking about fiction. Live in reality. The true issue with reality is not "AI doing all things", not at all. The true issue is it not doing all things and the stupid authorities insisting it does, and forcing the
26.
by bsenftner 1mo ago
Worth knowing how he died and more about his life: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Brain
27.
by bsenftner 1mo ago
> Do you believe people will be able to sustain their incomes at current levels if A.I. does most of the work? Does not matter, UBI will make the situation worse. And that "AI does most the work" is yet another fairytale. AI do
28.
by bsenftner 1mo ago
Which may as well be a fairy tale, not going to happen ever again. That was an anomaly.
29.
by bsenftner 1mo ago
UBI is a farce, and is the wealth class's yet another lever to control people. UBI will not be "universal", not in this human civilization of hyper stratification. Conditions will be placed, and only certain ethnicity, and so
30.
by bsenftner 1mo ago
Must use the Internet Archive now: https://web.archive.org/web/20260725174355/https://marshallb... The author died.

More ›