bryans

9 ms·

31.
by bryans 4y ago
If you find what I've said more rude than the person making several false claims about the history of DAWs and music, and declaring that folk and acoustic musicians don't care about how they sound -- among other complete nonsense
32.
by bryans 4y ago
> 1. That ALL engineers are musicians: His examples are correct No, they're actually not correct. Two of the examples he provided as "non-musican" engineers had tons of experience with producing electronic music, and the o
33.
by bryans 4y ago
I said nothing of the sort. In fact, the parent commenter is the one claiming that musicians are insignificant. You've misread everything and are putting words in my mouth. Please do better in the future.
34.
by bryans 4y ago
> there's some widespread belief that a DAW should be a tool for musicians [...] This means "usable by musicians who find themselves intimidated or confused by the interface [...] We all understood what you said and meant, and
35.
by bryans 4y ago
This is really all that needs to be quoted to show what nonsense you're trying to pull: > there's some widespread belief that a DAW should be a tool for musicians [...] I have no idea what I said that made you believe I was sug
36.
by bryans 4y ago
Every audio engineer is also a musician. Every DAW has been developed by audio and software engineers who are also musicians[1]. Every professional musician understands the basic concepts of audio production. DAW UIs mimic the interfaces of
37.
by bryans 4y ago
> What specific advances have been made in better detection and/or screening? Do we use better technology for this? The technology[1] and methodology used in detection has advanced significantly and repeatedly. > If there was som
38.
by bryans 4y ago
> I am not ignoring it: I was bringing a point on terminology, not on this particular lock or lock-picking methods. You declared an entirely new definition for lockpicking which is contradictory to all accepted definitions of lockpicking
39.
by bryans 4y ago
> I think there are plenty of ways to read the underlying research and still support a claim that individual specific components of a diet should be chosen to moderate saturated fat intake. Yes, all of the ways. It's the only inte
40.
by bryans 4y ago
Doesn't learning the Angular structure require learning? If that's the metric and you have to learn good structure for both frameworks, I'm not seeing the advantage. In fact, Angular's rigidity is only an advantage if th
41.
by bryans 4y ago
> Link 3 you cited says that saturated fats should be consumed in moderation. Nobody ever said that saturated fats should be consumed excessively. That would both fly in the face of logic and isn't true for any nutrient. So you&#x27
42.
by bryans 4y ago
> If it is settled science, I would hope you could find and share authoritative evidence that it is. What I’ve seen over the years (and I’m not that old) is that the mainstream “consensus” changes every 10-15 years The nature of science
43.
by bryans 4y ago
> That’s the trendy opinion for now. This seems to be cyclical. Citing the NYT isn’t really helpful since you can find basically every diet fad/trend in their pages. I didn't cite the NYT as information about dietary facts. I c
44.
by bryans 4y ago
> The code for every Angular project is structured the same way - The code for components (and directives, services, etc.) is generally very readable - Everything is easy(ish) to test. [...] And in general Angular seems much easier to le
45.
by bryans 4y ago
Except there are well-researched and medically-accepted facts about fats. So, while somebody may decide to push a diet which contradicts those facts, it doesn't turn the facts into political positions. It does, however, mean that the p
46.
by bryans 4y ago
> I think you have a problem with me communicating using (formal) logic. The problem is that what you're saying is contradictory to itself. You're conveniently ignoring all of the flaws being pointed out, and instead reiteratin
47.
by bryans 4y ago
That's a good question. KFC gets 12 million customers per day. Let's generously assume an average of one 9g packet is included per customer. The packets already contain 7% honey, so to go full honey is an additional demand of 100
48.
by bryans 4y ago
I'm rarely shocked by the ingredients of food anymore, but I was looking at a packet of "honey sauce" from KFC the other day, and couldn't help but laugh at the things we're doing to ourselves. There are 11 ingredie
49.
by bryans 4y ago
> I am not sure if I would call trying all combinations "picking s lock" [...] that would not make the lock pickable if I was to talk about it [...] but only when you are able to reduce the problem space from the full set of co
50.
by bryans 4y ago
> I am not sure if I would call trying all combinations "picking s lock" Lockpicking is defined as opening a lock with an instrument other than the appropriate key. It is not defined by how many attempts it takes. Many of the
51.
by bryans 4y ago
The issues are so much worse than what is being described in this post. Reddit-appointed moderators are used as a protective layer for all of the company's shady, anti-social and sometimes straight up illegal behaviors. The perfect exa
52.
by bryans 4y ago
The fun part of audio is that there's multiple ways to do it. You can use spectrum analysis, impulse response, harmonic frequency, beamforming, triangulation and more. Some would be easier than others in this situation, but you could t
53.
by bryans 4y ago
Exactly. And based on the test mechanism simply requiring a ~46 degree turn to fail, I think it could actually be done in ~300ms per attempt, which would make the maximum solution even lower at ~4 hours. That's of course still a lot be
54.
by bryans 4y ago
> Almost all states (and other countries) where abortion is legalized still have reasonable limits on when they may be performed (e.g., not after second trimester). I think we would both agree that an abortion of an otherwise viable and
55.
by bryans 4y ago
> I believe that the unborn baby is a viable human life at some point and that abortion without a justifiable reason after that point would be equivalent to murder. That's the entire point! You're not objecting to abortion. Y
56.
by bryans 4y ago
> I don’t know why you keep bringing up religion, I have not mentioned it at all. The only objection anyone has to abortion is based on religious beliefs. So, you didn't need to mention it. It's the foundation of the entire iss
57.
by bryans 4y ago
> How is pregnancy not a personal circumstance? Pregnancy does not, in and of itself, prevent access to medical care. So while it is a personal circumstance, it is entirely inapplicable within the context of care being intentionally prev
58.
by bryans 4y ago
None of your analogies are applicable. Somebody dying because their personal circumstances made receiving medical care difficult or impossible, is patently different than dying because someone else was allowed to deny them medical care
59.
by bryans 4y ago
Everything you've said is contradictory to reality, and you are displaying a fundamental misunderstanding of science and statistics. I won't engage with your increasingly childish antics, but I will make one last attempt at maki
60.
by bryans 4y ago
Your argument ignores nearly all of the factors involved with dosage -- most notably tolerance. Tolerance reduces perceived effectiveness, requiring increased dosage to achieve the desired psychological results. People regulate their consum

More ›