brkho

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by brkho 4y ago

   DrDc is unrelated to the issue here. As another commenter guessed, it's just an optimization to Chromium's graphics pipeline. Chrome has a number of processes that need to execute GPU work. For example, there's the renderer p
2. 2.▲
   by brkho 9y ago

   Theoretically, the OpenGL, WebGL, Vulkan, Metal, and Unity implementations can all have comparable quality with enough dev work. From a quick glance through the README, it doesn't seem like the OpenGL implementation is relying on any c
3. 3.▲
   by brkho 9y ago

   I wrote a blog post about WebRTC data channels which has the complete source for a proof of concept in a gaming context: http://blog.brkho.com/2017/03/15/dive-into-client-server-web... The example in my blog
4. 4.▲
   by brkho 9y ago

   WebRTC Data Channels don't actually let browsers send arbitrary UDP packets over the wire; rather, they only let you send SCTP packets tunneled over UDP. This distinction sounds pedantic because you can configure SCTP to deliver unreli
5. 5.▲
   A comprehensive dive into WebRTC for client-server web games(blog.brkho.com)

   8 points by brkho 10y ago|0 comments
6. 6.▲
   Client-server web games with WebRTC(blog.brkho.com)

   1 points by brkho 10y ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   by brkho 10y ago

   Even as someone who prefers the Vive in terms of overall experience, I think this article glosses over quite a few points and misrepresents the facts to the point where it shouldn't even be on HN for discussion. There are far less bias