Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
brigandish
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
brigandish
3mo ago
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. > Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, brigading, foreign agents, and the like. It degrades discussion and is
32.
▲
by
brigandish
3mo ago
> That's not being a "free speech" absolutist. One doesn't need to be a free speech absolutist to not be a fascist, far from it; and the exceptions prove the rule - those examples are the definition of exceptional. &q
33.
▲
by
brigandish
3mo ago
> i'm sure your reply will be pedantic Have you heard of the term "bad faith argument"? That's a good example. > - Opposition to political and cultural liberalism > Yes, banned speech on twitter that trans peopl
34.
▲
by
brigandish
3mo ago
That's not a rebuttal. Claiming to support is not support. Is Musk wielding the apparatus of state to ensure that any speech that he disagrees with is suppressed, e.g. on college campuses?
35.
▲
by
brigandish
3mo ago
Fascists don't support free speech. Please , learn what that word means[0] and then use it responsibly. We're already seeing the effects of misusing and overusing several other important words for political/societal discours
36.
▲
by
brigandish
3mo ago
> That's the whole point of the conversation lol > It's like you're side stepping the entire discourse. No, they addressed that with: > The only thing that would be non-consensual would be obligating the employer to
37.
▲
by
brigandish
3mo ago
> AOC also doesn't say anything about "moral", etc. She says you can't earn it and then gives several examples in a row of immoral and/or rentier economic practices. At no point does she give any example that i
38.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
Which Linux are you using for that?
39.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
> Why is social media so different? Because of what that ban entails that the others don't.
40.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
Baseball was invented in Britain.
41.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
Isn't the contention that, because football is pay to play in the US, the US isn't that good compared to places that it isn't pay to play ? Baseball, basketball, American football are all sports with much less international
42.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
My mate broke someone's arm bowling at him. Cricket always has an element of danger, for both the fielders and the batters.
43.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
I encourage you to look in to how risk is calculated. There are several ways, and all of them - excepting layman's attempts and Claude Haiku responses - are on a spectrum, not a binary. They do not resemble what you have provided.
44.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
If someone in your presence were to say "Fuck Willy_k" then I'm sure you'd take that as an aggression, as would any other normal person. It doesn't need HR to know that.
45.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
I quoted the straw man, so there's no mistake (on my part), and I would advise you to take a look at the HN guidelines before writing more comments. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html#comments
46.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
You don't need to imagine any, I provided one already.
47.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
Common law has dealt with this for nigh on a thousand years. If you put a person in reasonable fear that your behaviour may lead to them harming you, then they are threatening you. The captain and established protocol follow what has been
48.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
Your first two statements are a straw man and thus, become a non-sequitur. > As soon as you declare the possible effect to be effectively infinite in magnitude, you can justify any level of response to any level of risk. The possible eff
49.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
Risk is not a synonym for the likelihood of something happening, but the likelihood and its possible effect . For example, the risk of not wearing your seatbelt on the motorway is high because, even though most journeys will not require a
50.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
> explicitly not a threat I don't see that as necessarily true. I can imagine many situations where F INSERT NAME OF ENTITY would be considered threatening. If they had F the captain of this plane , would the captain be wrong t
51.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
> If you can't know whether something is a threat or not, the only reasonable response is to treat it as a non-threat. To someone whose primary consideration is safety, like the captain of an aeroplane, your logic is entirely nonsen
52.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
That is covered in the article: > Though some have questioned why anyone intending to blow up a plane would broadcast the word bomb, many terrorist acts have relied on the threat of a bomb as leverage during attempted hijackings or hosta
53.
▲
by
brigandish
4mo ago
If you write your own songs, you'll realise that they are infinitely surprising to you, much like one's own children. Just endlessly fascinating. I sing my own songs all the time, probably more than other people's. Of course,
54.
▲
by
brigandish
5mo ago
It doesn't have to be controlled in such a way that it produces monopolies or enables surveillance.
55.
▲
by
brigandish
5mo ago
I have decided that if they'll play dirty then I will. If someone says "protect the children" then I smear those saying it, e.g. Kier Starmer wants to protect children? He put Mandelson into government even though he was mat
56.
▲
by
brigandish
5mo ago
If I participate in a boxing match can I: a) be hurt b) win Consider whether this is a binary or a multiple choice question (and even whether any choices need be made).
57.
▲
by
brigandish
5mo ago
Fingers crossed!
58.
▲
by
brigandish
5mo ago
Are you in the UK? I've not had this happen to me (I'm not in the UK) so I'm wondering if the Online Safety Act has affected this, as it has with other products.
59.
▲
by
brigandish
5mo ago
You're proposing a binary version of "hurt", they are proposing a spectrum. If a regulation hurts company A but it will survive whereas company B, A's main and essentially only competitor stopping A from a monopoly, will
60.
▲
by
brigandish
5mo ago
This only applies to night time, and trains stop early compared to many other places. Also, there are plenty of paid parking spaces for use during the day, and you’ll often find cars parked in the street, even narrow ones, with the hazard l
More ›