bricksmart

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bricksmart 9y ago

   He's pointing out that the material in this article has been discussed ad nauseam and this doesn't present any new ideas.
2. 2.▲
   by bricksmart 9y ago

   Thank you for the reply. Having lurked on HN for a while, I'm used to some negativity, or at least very critical, comments. So when most of the comments for this piece appeared positive something seemed off. Anyway, I appreciate the en
3. 3.▲
   by bricksmart 9y ago

   Followup: why the downvote? This article has a bizarre and amateurish ending: "Despite Tadini's losses, his methods have continued to influence combat into the present. Mining and countermining, with all their attendant
4. 4.▲
   by bricksmart 9y ago

   Interesting subject, but why does it feel like I'm reading a passage from a standardized test?