brakedam

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by brakedam 3y ago

   This case is something different. Because everyone reviewed their Arxiv papers and found that there’s no meaningful figure for the resistivity. And even magnetization data was not matched between two Arxiv papers. Now, here is where we are.
2. 2.▲
   by brakedam 3y ago

   Now I understand what's going on in South Korea. Okay, this is more political than I thought. But the problem is, the researchers even didn't send the sample abroad to prove it. Even though they had many requests for a week. This
3. 3.▲
   by brakedam 3y ago

   This is very ambiguous. So, everyone can make samples in their kitchens, but unfortunately, the researchers don’t have enough samples to provide, right? Researchers have their own primary responsibility to prove it, not the public. And this
4. 4.▲
   by brakedam 3y ago

   But I heard that in the interview, Dr. Kim said they have various samples that have different magnetization properties. It doesn’t make sense that they have only a few samples, ironically. I’m sorry, but this makes me think that they are tr
5. 5.▲
   by brakedam 3y ago

   I don’t know what’s going on here, but I can see some guys are trying to make a LK-99 bubble in here. politically, not scientifically. We should be aware that there is still no critical evidence of room-temp superconductors.