braiamp

6 ms·

61.
by braiamp 3mo ago
The article just say it's insecure, the title says that such security is a "feature for stalkers". I'm sorry, I don't see how insecurity makes it better for stalkers.
62.
by braiamp 3mo ago
The title obviously has a slant, because the text of the article doesn't support it. So, yeah, I'm saying the title has a specific goal in mind.
63.
by braiamp 3mo ago
Because it serves a nefarious purpose: to smear the company that makes these devices. I would not be surprised if this is part of some kind of campaign designed to restrict or damage someone.
64.
by braiamp 3mo ago
The real moat aren't the models, but the tooling around the models that allow them to perform specific tasks/goals. That's what really sets apart frontier vs open. Open only has the model itself, closed have the tooling to en
65.
by braiamp 3mo ago
> The purpose of a college degree is NOT a job Superior education is the ladder towards self-sufficiency because that's what the labor market does, it requires you to hold a degree. Now, you may be right that the degree by itself do
66.
by braiamp 3mo ago
Despite what everyone said, I'm excited specifically for DKIM2. As someone that had managed a mailing list, that one is probably the hardest thing to juggle around and DKIM2 layering seems to fix that issue neatly. I hope postfix has a
67.
by braiamp 3mo ago
If anything, this moves it towards anyone having more access to everything. For example, reject isn't going to be treated anymore as a bounce. Now, provider policies still can and would be BS, but the standard doesn't tell them to
68.
by braiamp 3mo ago
Eh, I read the article, and at most you only have to wait for your MTA to update to add the required headers and update your DNS records and you are golden. It still uses the same key you generated as far I'm aware.
69.
by braiamp 3mo ago
I'm baffled that we still are thinking that we want thin phones. We have a gigantic camera bump that would be removed if the phone was thicker. Who wants a razor in their pocket, like really?
70.
by braiamp 3mo ago
No, but pointing out the irony of the situation is still helpful to anyone reading it.
71.
by braiamp 3mo ago
Only the regulation that doesn't evolve with the time or written so that it stays within the confines of a context that doesn't exists. Certain big country constitution is a prime example of that.
72.
by braiamp 4mo ago
This is a weird framing and only furthers that argument. No, if you give money for something, that something is yours. It will violating a bunch of fundamental contract law understanding if the ownership status of what you buy is ever quest
73.
by braiamp 4mo ago
> Regulations create monopolies. Even when regulations are aimed at curbing the control of giants, smaller players usually can't afford them and lose market share. This is actually taught as a competitive advantage strategy in busin
74.
by braiamp 4mo ago
The timing isn't lost on you, it's on the wrong galaxy. This is the regular requests for comments that the commission does on digital markets, the ISP's have been saying this since a while ago > In a new filing to the Comm
75.
by braiamp 4mo ago
I mean, for the second (third?) option specifically. You will notice that they will be more open to go outside of the standard of care if you have a working theory.
76.
by braiamp 4mo ago
Ok, there's a lot to unpack here and you really had the deck stacked against you. First, lets go from the top, once a test says X, disproving that X is really hard. And that's not unique to the medical profession, it's inhere
77.
by braiamp 4mo ago
A absolute swats of middle boxes that will not get addressed ever. As industry, it's preferable to create something that is a hard break and makes players upgrade and give people a feature to argue for said upgrade
78.
by braiamp 4mo ago
Pornhub checking my ID is pornhub's problem, not my ISP's, not my VPN's, not every other site I visit through it. A VPN isn't a porn bypass tool that happens to also do other things, it's infrastructure I run my who
79.
by braiamp 4mo ago
You've already surrendered your privacy to Meta, sure, this has nothing to do with Meta. This is your VPN, the one thing you use because you don't trust your ISP or the wifi you're on, now wanting your real ID before it works
80.
by braiamp 4mo ago
To further give context: the article is saying that most of the fuel transported around is done for long distances, so when something removes fuel use in the consumer side it has a double dip effect: less fuel consumed and less fuel used to
81.
by braiamp 4mo ago
I love how every harm you listed, is a platform design problem, and your fix touches none of it. A kid bypassing VPN age checks can still doomscroll and Roblox all day on a school wifi with no VPN at all. The only thing you've actually
82.
by braiamp 4mo ago
NoScript is a layer that makes my experience on the internet so much better.
83.
by braiamp 4mo ago
There's a easier solution by crime caused by poor people: they stop being poor. The fact that nobody tried is the thing that should be studied instead.
84.
by braiamp 4mo ago
Because that implies more supply and landlords are happy with the supply being restricted. The people that has the money to build won't, the government will follow the money, so the state doesn't help. That kind of question reeks
85.
by braiamp 4mo ago
Or that capital has captured the regulators and are happy with it.
86.
by braiamp 4mo ago
So, you changed topics from airbnb, which removes units from the rental market, to landlords in general? I think I can play that game. Lets go for the easiest one against landlords: Renting being the alternative to homelessness isn't a
87.
by braiamp 4mo ago
What is this saying differently from https://peps.python.org/pep-0827/ ?
88.
by braiamp 4mo ago
I find interesting that so many people say that this is a hard problem, while Discord puts this nugget: > Are you a Linux user? If so, are you sick of that lovely modal we made to tell you that there’s an update you need to go manually i
89.
by braiamp 4mo ago
Because EO can get annoying to fight, companies would prefer to not fighting it. That's why these actions are to be remembered, companies will complain, but they will also comply.
90.
by braiamp 5mo ago
Wow, this comment section is terrible, lets cut through the noise. The "you're buying a license, not a game" argument is the industry writing its own rules and then citing those rules as if they came from somewhere neutral. E

More ›