Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
braiamp
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
That's fine and all, but leave all by yourself. A territory isn't owned by the people that happen to be there. It's bound up in the systems and institutions they found and accepted, ingrained into a much bigger machinery. Alb
92.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
Even in worse case scenario, which this isn't, the affected persons would at most try to cheat the system. This proposal is really narrow to non-primary residences, that are also very valuable. None of which will affect 99.999% of the
93.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
I love how the comments miss that the problem these laws address deserve addressing, but from the producers side: making safe products for the public. This specific solution is fashioned after tobacco and alcohol regulation, which was never
94.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
How about this: nobody shall be unsafe online or offline, and the state shall guarantee it. That's a foundation you can build law on, instead of hoping every child got lucky with their parents.
95.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
Dude, your entire argument is welfare for the software makers, not fair business practices. You want developers to continue externalizing the cost of architecting their game in such a way that hosting is expensive for them. Consumers do not
96.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
Ok, and why you think that would be? Because games were like this before. Small and big. There are even modern games that are like this.
97.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
That's a lie. Consumers buy a copy of the product. There's a bunch of legal fundamentals that make it so. Contracts that give one side a complete control of someone else are rarely (if ever) legal. If it were, then people could be
98.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
Having a working implementation means that you have the means to re-make/re-build it from scratch. People are resourceful and would make a implementation without such limitations. Companies on the other hand after years of known vulner
99.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
Simple: that contract would be illegal. It's that simple. You can't put yourself into a position where you would be violating the law. The licensor would be on the hook for violating the law. This is "you can’t outsource comp
100.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
You know what? I'm tired of unintended consequences fear mongering. You know what else had a tons of unintended consequences? Mandating seat belts. This is the industry kicking and crying because they don't want to be told that th
101.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
How many small studio games have online multiplayer? Like really?
102.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
Note, this law would affect less than 1% of all games _released_. Just that those happens to be the games that a sizeable part of the population plays. And even then, you spend more tying your game to a online service than not doing so in t
103.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
> I don't want to use this thing, it sucks. Also, I don't want to change it one bit. People really dislike change, it's the same thing about some freak thing that happens like twice that you heard of, like shark attacks, b
104.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
It will first damage the batteries very fast, second, most users don't want to mess with that, they want to plug and play. So, on both counts your fears are misplaced.
105.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
Valve doesn't keep a historic of the numbers, you will have to do with people that collect them and aggregates them https://www.gamingonlinux.com/steam-tracker/
106.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
I think the actual answer you are looking for is this paragraph: > These old workarounds got subtle edge cases wrong in ways that produced occasional hitches, deadlocks, or weird behavior in specific games, which are bugs that don't
107.
▲
by
braiamp
5mo ago
Yeah was about to comment, parent says "if it is ancient", it is not. So the root comment is nothing burger. Stable has 1 release cycle old, and depending on how things play out, testing may have 2.93 or later anyways.
108.
▲
by
braiamp
6mo ago
I am on desktop and saw no such warning, but I'm also using adblockers and noscript.
109.
▲
by
braiamp
6mo ago
The domain for the org has expired and now it's a parking hosts. I don't know how maintained it is.
110.
▲
by
braiamp
6mo ago
What the heck is happening on this site with the pointer disappearing? For some reason the body tag has "cursor: none" which is never good.
111.
▲
by
braiamp
6mo ago
> If you're upset at collecting personal individual data, you're really going to love what these social media bans require in practice Which is why is also not a solution. Both are bad solutions because we drag our feet into cr
112.
▲
by
braiamp
6mo ago
No, educating customers doesn't work. What works is creating safe products. Remove algorithm recommendations as the default option, make collecting personal individual data for any purpose other than what the customer explicitly wants,
113.
▲
by
braiamp
6mo ago
Yeah, but many of those self-identify as anti-social rather than biased.
114.
▲
by
braiamp
6mo ago
They are entrenched enough that it's wrote off as cost of doing business. Big business have their internal instances so they are "insulated", everyone else isn't as critical and have the resources to do an internal solut
115.
▲
by
braiamp
6mo ago
How many milliseconds do you think this page took to render? I usually click and it's already done.
116.
▲
by
braiamp
6mo ago
Lets all get together and self-reflect on the bozos way.
117.
▲
by
braiamp
7mo ago
> don't use debian for gaming, as it is too far behind I use Debian stable on my laptop and testing on desktop. It is fine. Only the newest games that need a specific 0 day patch may suffer a bit but that's only for 1-2 weeks e
118.
▲
by
braiamp
7mo ago
It's about oversampling. Due how the survey is sent, a massive influx of machines coming online all at once will be more likely to trigger the survey. They know the general composition of their users, so they need the survey to be arou
119.
▲
by
braiamp
7mo ago
Gitlab service may be unreliable, but Gitlab the product to deploy is extremely fine. Many third party instances of Gitlab that don't have problems that only happens at scale.
120.
▲
by
braiamp
7mo ago
Friend probably still sleeping
More ›