boxed

9 ms·

241.
by boxed 5mo ago
Yes, 3.15+
242.
by boxed 5mo ago
Pretty successfully I would say. Armed police raided the server hosting provider scaring the shit out of some dudes who were just monitoring the power basically. And people went to prison.
243.
Let's Learn Hangul(letslearnhangul.com)
2 points by boxed 5mo ago|0 comments
244.
by boxed 5mo ago
It seems to be to many many programmers who keep using C++
245.
by boxed 5mo ago
Not good how? Are they TRUE? If so that's super bad.
246.
by boxed 5mo ago
I mean.. considering the alternatives of magic mushrooms which also have very promising results in early trials and have, afaik, no such scary side effects it seems like any risk big enough for doctors being needed close by seems bad.
247.
by boxed 5mo ago
He accidentally formalized spelling. You can't invent vocabulary when you're writing plays for a mass audience and want the audience to actually understand what is being said. That makes no sense.
248.
by boxed 5mo ago
Or LSD, or magic mushrooms.
249.
by boxed 5mo ago
> Further developing on the theme of self-play, humans have the ability to sense what we want (intellectually) and reach for it communally over thousands of years. It's an innate quality, and if AI starts participating (contrast to
250.
by boxed 5mo ago
The exact opposite. Improvements are step by step and small.
251.
by boxed 5mo ago
And all were invented piece by piece. Each human had to have updated training data to be able to handle the next tweak.
252.
by boxed 5mo ago
AI images are all unique and new.
253.
by boxed 5mo ago
Only after ditching communism and embracing markets mind you.
254.
by boxed 5mo ago
Both things can be true. The Chinese communist party was one of the biggest social movements ever. Millions died.
255.
by boxed 5mo ago
> He wrote articles arguing that pro-AI people are dismissive of risks or even suggesting they are intellectually lazy I mean.. this is 2026 right? You're not writing that comment from 2024 or something? We see massive problems alre
256.
by boxed 5mo ago
Just to play devils advocate: are we sure humans have demonstrated the ability to go beyond their training data? Like.. are we sure-sure about that?
257.
by boxed 5mo ago
No it doesn't. It just means you'll be eaten and turned into paperclips first.
258.
Show HN: Micromort Risk Visualizer(boxed.github.io)
5 points by boxed 5mo ago|0 comments
259.
by boxed 5mo ago
Hopefully it's a race worth winning and not a race to global disaster.
260.
by boxed 5mo ago
Schools don't teach actual basics that make people grounded in reality imo. Of course it gets worse with things like ChatGPT that teachers are not only not trained to explain, but didn't even exist when current adults went to scho
261.
by boxed 5mo ago
No screenshot examples even? :/
262.
by boxed 5mo ago
Huh. I guessed 13% of Demographic voters as LGBTQ, and the correct answer is 6%. But if you look at wikipedia the numbers globally for gay, lesbian, and bi should be above 6%. That's weird. I would expect Democrats to be slightly above
263.
by boxed 5mo ago
If the code is written in a language that no one can read it becomes vibe coded by definition. However, if it's a readable language then people CAN look at the diffs.
264.
by boxed 5mo ago
I re-read that passage where he mentions the speed of light. Clearly he's trying to explain that if you start from the bottom of what the hardware can do and try to get that all to the programmers hands then you have something that is
265.
by boxed 5mo ago
Nope. Claude just gets along quite well out of the box.
266.
by boxed 5mo ago
The speed of electricity is not the speed of electrons first of all. Secondly, the difference here is not very big.
267.
by boxed 5mo ago
Speed of light is actually the limiting factor in modern chips and has been for a long time. It's one of the major reasons why process shrinks are jumps in performance: literally the speed of signals in the CPU shrinks.
268.
by boxed 5mo ago
I was arguing against the previous poster using their logic. I agree the logic is stupid :P
269.
by boxed 5mo ago
The previous posted talked about incentives. I countered using their intellectual framework. This is just normal debate.
270.
by boxed 5mo ago
I mean... this was common knowledge before the election...

More ›