boxed

11 ms·

271.
by boxed 5mo ago
From what I understand, rust "unsafe" is actually pretty damn safe compared to an actually memory unsafe language.
272.
by boxed 5mo ago
"All downsides"? What do you mean?
273.
by boxed 5mo ago
> Mojo is cool but I just don't understand the python backwards compat thing. They're holding themselves back with that. In reality I think they've dropped that pretty hard. Literally you can't even get the length of
274.
by boxed 5mo ago
I'm looking at this transcript and I'm getting a different picture than what you describe https://podscripts.co/podcasts/lex-fridman-podcast/381-chris... . Yea, he doesn't specifically say vectoriza
275.
by boxed 5mo ago
For the ORM/schema evolution part at least imo. And iommi is written for it so that is also a big boost (I'm one of the authors of iommi :P)
276.
by boxed 5mo ago
Yea. I expect it to be better because we have this in Sweden and it's vastly better than the US' system :P But there are many other things that are different of course, so hard to know which is which.
277.
by boxed 5mo ago
States have huge incentives to keep the population healthy though. Sick days aren't a tax base.
278.
by boxed 5mo ago
A dig at Django's ORM seems hilarious. I wonder how many SQL injection vulnerabilities are written daily by Go devs.
279.
by boxed 5mo ago
Why should someone sell food for a profit? We literally DIE within DAYS of we can't get food! You see the issue here right? Now.. who pays is the question. Imo it must be the state, because otherwise there are too many perverse incenti
280.
by boxed 5mo ago
There's a third option though: the state is the customer, not the individual. Then private healthcare can work. Insurance companies sort of try to emulate that, but it doesn't really work.
281.
by boxed 5mo ago
Well... the article made self deprecating fun of the click bait title, showed the code every step of the way, and actually did achieve the claim (albeit with wall clock time, not CPU/GPU time). And it wasn't "equivalent pytho
282.
by boxed 5mo ago
I've recently used Claude to write quite a bit of mojo ( https://github.com/boxed/TurboKod ) and I can quite confidently say that Claude will write deprecated mojo syntax a lot , but the compiler tells it and it fi
283.
by boxed 5mo ago
Not to mention that C++ basically can't be made to be safe. But Rust is probably fine.
284.
by boxed 5mo ago
Thanks. I'm thinking it could be a sort of reference implementation to build your own custom IDE the way you like it. I'm going to attempt to get TurboKod to be good enough to be my daily driver, we'll see how it goes.
285.
by boxed 5mo ago
https://github.com/boxed/TurboKod I started this just for the lulz, but now I've got: copy/paste/undo multiple cursors debuggers syntax highlighting (even nested languages with jetbrains style comments!)
286.
by boxed 5mo ago
> Nation flags, on the other hand, are by definition exclusionary towards an outgroup that exists by legal distinction I did notice how extremely specific that was. Because the current LGBTQ+ grouping have been quite exclusionary towards
287.
by boxed 5mo ago
Yea but that falls apart on even a slight poke. Who is trans? Anyone who identifies as trans. Who is British? Anyone who identifies as British. There's not a lot of difference there. Citizenship COULD be used, but now you're talki
288.
by boxed 5mo ago
Which seems pretty reasonable tbh. Claude Code is amazing with Elm in my experience.
289.
by boxed 5mo ago
I think the iPhone will warn you if your battery performance is significantly degraded?
290.
by boxed 5mo ago
Hmm? Which is which? Is this one of those British things people from normal countries don't understand? Like the difference between United Kingdom and Great Britain.
291.
by boxed 5mo ago
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewnwgnqj2qo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Trans%2B_Pride I'm seeing a lot of flags.
292.
by boxed 5mo ago
A red flag that is blowing into your face? :P
293.
by boxed 5mo ago
Philosophy doesn't own words afaik. Words have different meaning in different domains. > many people seem very confused on the subject, which is not too surprising, especially for scientists who essentially reject philosophy, like D
294.
by boxed 5mo ago
I started porting TurboVision from C++ to mojo with Claude as a sort of joke. Then I said, why not port the entire Turbo editor? And then like. hmm.. it doesn't have all the modern affordances like language servers, syntax highlighting
295.
by boxed 5mo ago
Sure. But it's super obvious from context that different speakers do NOT agree on any of that.
296.
by boxed 5mo ago
> My definition was exclusively defining in terms of a human phenomena Well that's a horrible definition. You put into the DEFINITION that ONLY humans can be conscious? > Instead of repeating yourself reread again what I initiall
297.
by boxed 5mo ago
Again: you haven't defined what you mean by the word. Dawkins didn't either. It's absolute nonsense without the definition.
298.
by boxed 5mo ago
With your definition they clearly are. They move around, they respond to their environment and take decisive actions when needed. If a human does that they are absolutely "conscious" if you only mean it as the sense of conscious&#
299.
by boxed 5mo ago
> In fact, I think consciousness is the ability to feel. Just having senses is enough? So a thermometer or a camera is conscious?
300.
by boxed 5mo ago
Those terms are not really how we use the word "conscious" in any other situation though. With a definition like that you would say a rock is unconscious (I guess reasonable), a pretty cold bacteria is unconscious (hmm.. ok I gue

More ›