boreq

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by boreq 2mo ago

   Thanks /u/Foxboron for this information.
2. 2.▲
   by boreq 1y ago

   The author's quite reasonable and polite request to not change the appearance of the project is pretty straightforward so morally no, it cannot. Feel free to write your own version though. I hope I helped.
3. 3.▲
   by boreq 1y ago

   So what you are saying is that it's anubis that saved their website.
4. 4.▲
   Claims of Anonymity of the Steam Hardware Survey(0x46.net)

   12 points by boreq 5y ago|5 comments
5. 5.▲
   by boreq 6y ago

   https://glenda.0x46.net/ Website resembling the Plan 9's rio desktop environment.
6. 6.▲
   Ik Spreek Geen Nederlands(0x46.net)

   4 points by boreq 7y ago|0 comments
7. 7.▲
   Piping Curl to S(hell)(0x46.net)

   6 points by boreq 7y ago|0 comments
8. 8.▲
   It is your moral obligation to use Firefox(0x46.net)

   87 points by boreq 7y ago|67 comments
9. 9.▲
   by boreq 8y ago

   It is your lucky day - there is a standard for this as well https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_user_directories
10. 10.▲
    by boreq 8y ago

    Which is especially sad as supporting the standard described in my post is a non breaking change if you are still going to read the old location of the configuration and data files as well.
11. 11.▲
    by boreq 8y ago

    That is the exact problem that the standard I talk about was designed to solve (apart from the clutter in the home directory).
12. 12.▲
    Dotfile madness(0x46.net)

    1146 points by boreq 8y ago|514 comments