borapdx

6 ms·

1.
by borapdx 4y ago
No you are not, because you do not know for sure if the device is really competitive. Most people assume such judgments are clear and obvious but that is completely wrong. It is really about other people think, including of course the paten
2.
by borapdx 4y ago
All good points but what matters to them is positive correlation with increasing short term revenue and showing they are in a phase they are extracting (some) profits from what they got billions from investors through the years. On top of t
3.
by borapdx 4y ago
Yes, there are cases users want links and there is no problem displaying them in the results with direct answers e.g as sources. It is really about the change of focus, to providing direct answers, in both short and longer form, as opposed
4.
by borapdx 4y ago
No, it is not just you, the quality of Google results has gotten dramatically worse. BTW, you can ask Google 'is Google in decline' and see for yourself (DISCLAIMER: my answer on Quora is highly ranked where you can go into more d
5.
by borapdx 5y ago
The principal step will be to move on from keywords and indexing, which are now a legacy technology, almost 26 years after Google started it all. Returning blue links is a thing of the past, as the Web of yesterday is long gone. Blue links
6.
by borapdx 5y ago
Good thread, there are more and more alternatives as Google has been in decline for years in terms of quality of results. This decline is out in the open as can be easily seen on Google itself. DuckDuckGo is very good and they have been ste
7.
by borapdx 5y ago
Yottaanswers came about as an effort to build a scalable AI vector search engine capable of billions of direct answers to questions, with no ads nor tracking. The question of how many direct answers Google is currently capable of (e.g. &#x2
8.
Show HN: Yottaanswers – get direct answers to queries from billions of vectors(yottaanswers.com)
3 points by borapdx 5y ago|1 comments