boppinz

8 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by boppinz 3y ago

   I think this is hardly the genocide-denial you think it is. In the Gaddafi case, I doubt he really sides with a military dictator. His critique has always been how the West intervenes, but mainly for economic security and superiority. We do
2. 2.▲
   by boppinz 3y ago

   nah, I think a lot of armchair philosopher techies on here could use some alternate opinions and dialectics. The primary reason for bringing him up (or any philosopher on this forum, really) is the nexus of ethics and AI. Although we haven&
3. 3.▲
   by boppinz 3y ago

   Laymen need people who can synthesize the works of academics/researchers. If someone like Chomsky wasn't talking about "faciness" and the ethics of ChatGPT, would anyone really bring that up? In an academic setting or ot
4. 4.▲
   by boppinz 3y ago

   1 - His Ukraine stance is simply that we have had a Cold War paradox in our American minds since the 50s, Russia is both too strong a foe to ignore and a paper tiger working off of shoddy USSR tanks and being beat by some farmers with lock-
5. 5.▲
   by boppinz 3y ago

   I'm sorry but that discredits his wide history as a modern intellectual. He did philosophy and linguistics from the start. Like it's fine to not agree with him, but he often offers a great introduction to topics like war and labor