bonoboTP

34 ms·

811.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
The question is how you define good. They surely want the Ai to be good in the sense that it rejects all claims that they think can get away with rejecting. But it should not reject those where rejection likely results in litigation and los
812.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
It's an accounting 101 thing to use all tricks in the book to reduce the reported profit, to avoid paying taxes on that profit.
813.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
> Each increment in progress is a massive time save and value add. Based on the history of digitalization of businesses from the 1980s onwards, the spreadsheets will just balloon in number and size and there will be more rules and more
814.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Usually this is very hard because the tasks and the job often subtly shifts in somewhat unpredictable and unforeseen ways and there is no neat clean abstraction that you can just implement as an application. Too hererogeneous, too messy, to
815.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
In the "most literal" interpretation no. It's generally safe to read the Bible at work, (during times when reading anything non-work related is allowed).
816.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
This is beypnd jobs and corporations and is about humanity and civilization. A small minority of people in every era actually pushed on any kind of frontier. That's ok. We need people who just execute the mundane tasks too, that's
817.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
On the other hand if I'm honest, all this noodling around as a teen didn't give me a super robust foundation at all. I had a kind of folk understanding, or rough mental model of the things but it made me like it as a hobby and ide
818.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Yes, but it shouldn't be mandatory for "regular" jobs. People often dislike the idea that there are some ambitious, agentic, talented, motivated people who really put in the hours and their job is simultaneously their hobby e
819.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
There's a danger of romanticizing the past, but I think there was just less metric based pressure on these people than today. In the 70s, the whole consultant-led transformation of all corporations wasn't fully complete yet.
820.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Yes, but that requires admitting that the employees are flesh and bones humans with human social relationships between them and this stuff can't be tabulated and accounted and bean-counted. And it's rather outright seen as a risk
821.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
I just remembered this video https://youtu.be/7vWSi44ZTSw and it seemed like a chill place with nerds having fun making something. (Actually they were still DMA at this time, not Rockstar). And as for the achievement, the p
822.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
I don't think you can recreate this in any top-down manner no matter how well-intentioned. It has to matter to them, and what's more, it gives you extra boost if you aren't supposed to do it and no parent or teacher pats you
823.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
It's interesting and heartwarming to see how similar the spirit of many successful software projects was. Creative collaboration, open play, extremely high trust, by people who really intrinsically love what they do. It goes against so
824.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Yeah humans have done this physically for very long. We have puny little teeth but have knives and butchering tools much better than any animal's teeth. We have little hair, but make clothes that can keep us warm in the arctic or even
825.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Yes but bird aren't ornithologists. It's a bit like on Reddit, as a speaker of a language that's not so popular for learning, when there are some language learners asking questions, we get lots of confident but wrong answers
826.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Ok, but then it doesn't make sense to dismiss AI based on that. It fails the Turing test, because it's creators intentionally don't even try to make something that is good at the (strictly defined) Turing test. If someone rea
827.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Okay but we are not really optimizing them to emulate humans right now. In fact, it's the opposite. The mainstream bots are explicitly trained to not identify as humans and to refuse to claim having thought or internal feelings or cons
828.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
> I don't care if AI wrote the book, if the book is good. Not so sure. Books are not all just entertainment but they also develop one's ouook on life, relationships, morality etc. I mean, of course books can also be written by
829.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
I sneak out to the toilet and ask chatgpt what should happen in the next chapter. Or do you stick a camera there too?
830.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Can you be more concrete? What kind of answer/conversation do you see as demonstrating passing the test, that you think is currently not possible.
831.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
There are a bunch of these topics that everyone feels qualified to say something about. Consciousness, intelligence, education methods, nutrition, men vs women, economic systems etc. It's a very emotional topic because people feel thei
832.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
This looks like a knee-jerk reaction to the title instead of anything substantial.
833.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
I doubt that you need any of that or it has any use for dealing with kids ages 3-6. Every granny and auntie knew how to do it since time immemorial. Just let them play, go out in the yard, chase the ants, dig some holes in the mud, run arou
834.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
TensorFlow was an overengineered Google-style mess and they constantly made breaking changes. All the graph building and session running was way too complex, with too much global state and variable sharing was complicated and based on namin
835.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Ok, and I'm saying that in that case you wouldn't see an effect, precisely because there would be no filtering.
836.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
Okay, that's an empirical question. I rather doubt it and think that the more adept teachers are more likely to apply there and to get through it. It's a filtering mechanism.
837.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
SAM (Segment Anything Model) by Meta is a popular go-to choice for off the shelf segmentation. But the exciting new research is moving beyond the narrow task of segmentation. It's not just about having new models that get better scores
838.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
The study is about preschool (ages 3-6).
839.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
You aren't contradicting me. Teachers who pass the tests required for this probably are from the top of their teacher cohort regarding intelligence, consciousness, empathy, motivation etc and they are likely better paid, so less stress
840.
by bonoboTP 1y ago
And not "pass through itself" but "pass through its copy"

More ›