boesboes

16 ms·

271.
by boesboes 3y ago
That seems to be the exact point the author makes: you need to know some fundamentals to properly use databases. Even if you are not doing super complex stuff.
272.
by boesboes 3y ago
More like 'Frustrated' if you ask me
273.
by boesboes 3y ago
That 's a pretty desperate move imo haha
274.
by boesboes 3y ago
This kind of comment always blows my mind. How can you come in and say 'well, actually, i think what you say you experience is not true. And disregard all the literature on the subject too!'
275.
by boesboes 3y ago
yeah, my thinking is we are to focussed on the current state-of-the-art approaches (i.e ooo superscalar, ht, memory architecture etc) where we can eek out the last few % of performance. I wonder if doing something radically different, would
276.
by boesboes 3y ago
Another day, another speculative execution vuln.. IMHO: all this speculation is a local maximum and it show we have fundamental issue with how we design 'computers'
277.
by boesboes 3y ago
And that the hardware is not overbooked. I found that my ci/cd runs would vary between 8 and 14 minutes (for a specific task in the pipeline, no cache involved) between reruns. And it seemed correlated to time of day. So pretty sure th
278.
by boesboes 3y ago
Stats they looked at are for desktop & laptops, so consoles are not considered. Neither are servers, which I suspect is mostly Intel too still. They also haven't looked at tablets, so all those M2's in iPads are not counted. N
279.
by boesboes 3y ago
Chill a bit mate, someone didn't get you joke. No need to be a cunt about it.
280.
by boesboes 3y ago
> Each pipeline run is optimized for efficiency. Whether your priority is saving time or optimal use of resources, TeamCity Pipelines gives you control over how your CI/CD flow is perfected. I wouldn't call allowing users to sw
281.
by boesboes 3y ago
Do you have eyes?
282.
by boesboes 3y ago
Problem is the introduction was generated with chatgpt and they forgot to remove the 'Sure, here is a...' :)
283.
by boesboes 3y ago
What did we expect? We have here a tool specifically good for writing the things we cant be asked to. This is the one of the primary use cases for LLMs. We all want to use AI to write our emails and resumes, but no one else is allowed to. I
284.
by boesboes 3y ago
A unikernel application is a VM. It's like a container, but without needing docker + linux to run on. I was running a web application written in ruby, distributed in a container, running in docker on linux in a VM. That could become a
285.
by boesboes 3y ago
Point seems rather clear to me: yt was about making ‘fun content’, now it is about maximizing clicks and views. Of course we can argue what is fun content, but it’s the same complaint as what with the internet as a whole: click-bait vs real
286.
by boesboes 3y ago
No
287.
by boesboes 3y ago
She has a PhD in astrophysics and is a specialist on blackholes. In her video's such as this one she goes into what the paper claims and then looks at the evidence for and against, based on other research and theory. She knows her stuf
288.
by boesboes 3y ago
FYI: From my experience, if you do more the 20-25TB, you can get 75% off no questions asked.
289.
by boesboes 3y ago
Now we know why.. jk :)
290.
by boesboes 3y ago
I think it is just the bubble/hype effect around transformers and AI. I might try to use transformers to solve tic-tac-toe and apply for some VC moneys. In a few years we'll all be writing about how much more efficient actual code
291.
by boesboes 3y ago
I even got popups with premium, trying to get me to listen to there bullshit playlists... And then they gaslight you and call it support. I'm ashamed I've paid them for years. I've spend, over the years, probably more the 5x
292.
by boesboes 3y ago
I'm with you. I thought it was a joke at first
293.
by boesboes 3y ago
That read like a house episode. They did all the test, only to discover it was the one rare thing that explains all symptoms contracted in the most obvious way. :)
294.
by boesboes 3y ago
What negative comments?
295.
by boesboes 3y ago
Ah, there was more to the article? I gave up after a few photo's..
296.
by boesboes 3y ago
If only they had all kinds of different product line for different people!
297.
by boesboes 3y ago
I wouldn't mind these providers being aggressive with spam filtering IF they would just bounce the messages so i know WHY. I've had so many cases where an 'email wasn't sent' by our systems and then the logs show it
298.
by boesboes 3y ago
First: Most users don't care. From their perspective, its' always the senders fault/problem. And the burden is always on the sender to prove it was actually outlook that dropped the email etc. Second: corporate & institut
299.
by boesboes 3y ago
yeah, just get a better paying job!
300.
by boesboes 3y ago
Meta: Just please, please, stop building these scroll-jacking bullshit websites. They are unreadable, confusing and just stupid.

More ›