bnl_umass

5 ms·

1.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
I understand well how it works. I agree this is not possible today’s code base but that limitation is due to a design choice. It’s due to a policy decision that the privacy of children who have been sexually exploited is not as important as
2.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
The “conclusions” section of the site makes this same point.
3.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
The website actually states “not very secure at all”. This hacker news submission changed the title.
4.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
1. I said “extensively” used for csam. What’s my source/evidence for that claim? This list of peer reviewed papers, cases, and government reports: https://csam-bib.github.io . 2. My site shows a mathematical model of securit
5.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
I am the author. I am telling you are wrong about that.
6.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
There is no question about that. The site makes use of current statistics from the Tor Project.
7.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
There is a known solution. Did you know that the Tor Project allows exit nodes to filter based on the clear internet IP. So filtering is ok. However, if a relay refuses to service an onion site directory look up, it will be banned by the Di
8.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
Really? Tell me why.
9.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
The math and the code is all there. I’d love to have a discussion about what the real value is. Further, why hasn’t the Tor Project provided this calculation? Why hasn’t anyone? I think it’s necessary.
10.
by bnl_umass 1y ago
My apologies. I don’t believe that was their intent to create a network for csam. But after decades of it being used extensively for csam, why would they take no corrective action?