Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bmm6o
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
bmm6o
5y ago
It's a little dated now, but all your friends who were constitutional scholars last month are epidemiologists this month. I agree that it seems to be a new phenomenon and i think it's partly social media but also our tendency to b
92.
▲
by
bmm6o
5y ago
Specifically for planarity, it's pretty easy to convince yourself that K5 and K3,3 are minimally non-planar. You don't come out with a rigorous proof but you do get an intuitive feel. With a decent motivating example it's acc
93.
▲
by
bmm6o
5y ago
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard covers its abandonment, including by USD
94.
▲
by
bmm6o
5y ago
I believe it's still common practice at private clubs, though i haven't been to one in a while. Menu with prices for the member, without prices for the guests.
95.
▲
by
bmm6o
5y ago
Are you really asking why the line is drawn between "just making harmless jokes" and "making jokes at the expense of another group"? You don't have to agree, but I think the difference and why someone would suggest
96.
▲
by
bmm6o
5y ago
What does "people who talk" even mean here? I gather it's supposed to parallel "people who joke about the 'funny' names of people different from them", but how does the phrase end?
97.
▲
by
bmm6o
5y ago
Doesn't the indeterminate mean rely on the distribution including negative values? Sleep() requires a non-negative value.
98.
▲
by
bmm6o
5y ago
Are you arguing against specialization and trade in general, or just in the specific case of staple food?
99.
▲
by
bmm6o
5y ago
For "normal" mobbing, 6 people is too many. If I had 6 devs coding (which I often do) that's very rarely going to be a single mob. It could split up 2/2/2, 3/3, 1/2/3 or whatever, but a single group o
100.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
You've picked an odd subthread to take your stand in then, since that's explicitly the topic of the post you are replying to.
101.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
Yes, but presumably the buyers know what they can do with the CO2. I do think that knowing what happens next is important if you're interested in reducing atmospheric CO2.
102.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
They may say that, but it's unsupported by science. The red flag is that nobody says anything more specific than "toxin".
103.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
I'd be interested to read more about Tinder's application. Off the top of my head, i don't see how it would apply to a dating app.
104.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
You're not wrong, but if your code breaks when you apply the simplest refactorings you probably aren't thinking about minifying your code. And while Javascript does let you put yourself in that position, I've never seen it in
105.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
It seems like an IDE could know if there is a single implementation and could go to it, especially if the interface is not visible outside the project ("internal" in C#). In practice, the interface is in the same file as the prima
106.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
Right. Often there are 2 types of interfaces in a project. The first are "natural" interfaces, that you have put some design into and are meant to be reusable. Things like Streams or Collections. When you write a function that use
107.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
The job market is not a natural phenomenon like gravity. It is essentially a societal construct already subject to regulation. If it produces outcomes we - its builders and participants - don't like, we can change it. It's true th
108.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
> I fail to see how the President's comments are any more inflammatory than hers. There are none so blind as those who do not wish to see.
109.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
If the question is about comparing the performance of immediate mode and retained mode, the comparison should be between two otherwise-similar applications. There are a lot of applications that are faster than Spotify, but that says more ab
110.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
Sure, and then B comes by again. Which just means there are different use cases with different definitions of correct, and you need to specify yours.
111.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
I don't think TLS cares why the certificate is trusted, validating certificates is higher on the stack, and you've probably seen the browser UX for accepting an invalid certificate. I know I've added a non-CA cert to my trust
112.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
If you assume you can ignore the hard parts, the problem becomes easier, I guess. You still need to know initial conditions to impossible accuracy.
113.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
OP didn't say that it was a certainty, so a single case isn't really relevant either way.
114.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
This is definitely true as far as the math goes, applying a prf does reduce entropy. But does it decrease it in a way that an attacker can take advantage of?
115.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
That was my first thought. Over a lot of the curve it's almost free to run on a bigger slice. When you get down to just a few billing quanta the math didn't work out in your favor.
116.
▲
Macaroons: Cookies with Contextual Caveats for Decentralized Authorization
(research.google)
3 points
by
bmm6o
6y ago
|
0 comments
117.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
The looseness of html is usually in regards to automatically closing tags or unquoted attributes. You can keep strict syntax enforcement and still recognize and skip unknown tags or attributes.
118.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
"once counterparties have authenticated each other's messages" is the omission that changes the meaning of the quote.
119.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
The GC pauses clocks, too. There's no way to detect a pause from inside the universe.
120.
▲
by
bmm6o
6y ago
Does it matter how long destroying the universe takes, since that's in the unsorted branch? The universe with the sorted list continues immediately, the cleanup is handled elsewhere.
More ›