Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bluelightning2k
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Is that even true though? As per another comment Gemini CLI and OpenAI Codex have more stars, and they're both much larger companies. Then Replit, V0, Lovable are all extremely popular. I don't have a horse in this race just find
92.
▲
Ask HN: Why do Cursor, Windsurf and Claude Code dominate the conversation?
28 points
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
|
38 comments
93.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Realistically - LLMs don't "delete the database". I find it quite unlikely that it proposed drop all out of nowhere. I wonder if what actually happened was a schema migration with an ORM? Prisma is still a pretty common choic
94.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Analogy: wow this Tesla full self driving mode is legit, the car really can drive itself! I'm all in, I've fired my driver and deleted Uber. OK the car scraped my other car. I made it apologize and PROMISE not to do it again. OH N
95.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
I'd guess it's something like Operator which works on your PC not a remote virtual one.
96.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Is this that machines rising up thing I've heard so much about? (Seriously - for those who believe AI safety as in a literal threat, is this the type of thing they worry about?)
97.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
"I have an idea for a startup. it's like AI but BETTER. Wouldn't you like better AI? Money please!"
98.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
SUCH a good comment - made me laugh
99.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
People with no product, no specific insight, and no published plan raising $$ trillions, due to elite background. (Sure -- that background is somewhat self earned.)
100.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
This is so weird to me. Yes, she was there at OpenAI and by all accounts a super respected non researcher . Clearly she's incredible, her reputation proceeds her etc. but is operational strength (being a good exec) really what gets to
101.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
As someone who stuck with it - it's good. And it's not actually just a thin wrapper. Their tab model is really, really good now (I think that was Cursor's big advantage for a long time). And they also price very fairly (read:
102.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Reading this made me wish I hadn't named my son Windsurf
103.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
It's weird being a Windsurf fan on HN. You get the feeling that you're in the minority or doing it wrong because the dialog is dominated by Cursor and (more recently) Claude Code. It's also been a lot of random stuff recently
104.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
As an actual user of Windsurf model, I don't think "tried" is fair. I sometimes use it. It's not as smart as Gemini but it iterates quicker and is very well aligned with their tool calls
105.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
It's a staggeringly bad deal. It's a hugely expensive task where unless you are the literal best in the world, you would never even see any usage. And even for those who are BOTH best and well known they have to be willing to lose
106.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Windsurf has developed their own fron tier model. It's pretty good. It's not sota but it's very well aligned with their tool call formatting etc.
107.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
isn't using software like this deeply illegal? or is that a legislative blind-spot? seems like this database should be sent to the FBI and someone can make a career out of prosecuting
108.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Interestingly I think I would over-think this. The interviewer is assuming a single server, running in a VPS type environment. There's also no notion of state persistence/timeout/recovery etc. I think I'd immediately hav
109.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
I can top this. The Erudite zone was literally built around a massive chasm. Early on in the game I unlocked "levitate" - and naturally levitated down into the big chasm. A little way down a loading screen hits for a zone called &
110.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
I don't think this is a security flaw. That's like saying it's a security flaw in the Chrome store that you could enable dev mode, copy the malware and run it that way.
111.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
I read through the pricing page and it's super confusing. Like I can understand it but it just seems very awkward. I much prefer the price, and pricing model, of Windsurf (although Claude 4 not being an option is odd)
112.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
This is impressive. But it just strikes me as optimizing the wrong thing. A CTF shouldn't be about submission ops. Surely it would be better for everyone if all teams who send the flag within a submission window share the prize
113.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
I can't say I've ever wanted to transcribe code from an image. That seems super niche. Perhaps the specific idea is to harvest coding textbooks as training data for LLMs?
114.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Two takes here. Cynical and optimistic. Cynical take: describing yourself as a full stack AI IDE company sounds very invest-able in a "what if they're right" kind of way. They could plausibly ask for higher valuations, etc. O
115.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
I don't like or agree with this take. You're basically saying - "something good exists, so why try to improve upon it". Their stated goal is to improve on the frontier models. It's ambitious, but on the other hand t
116.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
potato + microwave = potato tree
117.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Interesting choice to have your only demo video be testing a CLI. Unless that's literally the use-case it's for?
118.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Turns out the non profit structure wasn't very profitable
119.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
I like deno's security model where you have to enable things. But I think it made a HUGE mistake to the point of being useless. Realistically, we need to grant access to env variables, network, etc. So those flags are functionally usel
120.
▲
by
bluelightning2k
1y ago
Couple things: First, perf you mention is from fundamentally CPU intensive workloads, not a sparse async environment like a typical server. Second (far more important) the reason we do this is type safety. We don't want types to break
More ›