2 ms·
This is so weird to me. Yes, she was there at OpenAI and by all accounts a super respected non researcher. Clearly she's incredible, her reputation proceeds h
by bluelightning2k 1y ago
This is so weird to me.
Yes, she was there at OpenAI and by all accounts a super respected non researcher.
Clearly she's incredible, her reputation proceeds her etc. but is operational strength (being a good exec) really what gets to AGI?
Feels almost like cargo-culting.
- dan-robertson 1y agoI suppose one should expect ‘time to agi’ to be a function of: 1. Researchers 2. Productivity-enhancing things in the org (either technical stuff like frameworks/optimisations or nebulous social things like better collaboration) 3. Amount of available compute. 4. Luck And then the past experience with openAI should help a lot with doing a good job of #1 and #2 even if it is just being a competent executive.
- yunwal 1y agoSurely availability of data is here as well?
- Oarch 1y agoSorry: precedes
- TrackerFF 1y agoIIRC, she was the driving force behind ChatGPT - the product, that is. Arguably the most successful AI/LLM product. Maybe the product she’s pitched has massive commercial potential.
- _yy01 1y agoWhat does one do to be considered as "driving force" et al?
- techpineapple 1y agoThe ability to attract good researchers is probably more important than being one your self. > Feels almost like cargo-culting. Why almost?