blueflow

55 ms·

901.
by blueflow 2y ago
Might be a cultural difference (im not from the US), but leaving a 10 year unsupervised with content from (potentially malicious) strangers really throws me off. Wouldn't this be the perfect precedence case on why minors should not be
902.
by blueflow 2y ago
> it looks like a perfect example of why we need a standard A standard wouldn't fix mistakes in the manpage. What is your proposal?
903.
by blueflow 2y ago
Heh, but if its in Debian stable then its probably not recent.
904.
by blueflow 2y ago
From the README: It wants to put its config in ~/.tmux.conf. With boxxy, you can put its config in ~/.config/tmux/tmux.conf From tmux(1): By default, tmux loads the system configuration file from /etc&#x2
905.
by blueflow 2y ago
Its like using APM to identify cheaters in Starcraft 1. Jaedong and Flash will get banned together with the actual cheaters.
906.
by blueflow 2y ago
Original announcement: https://pidgin.im/posts/2024-08-malicious-plugin/ LWN: https://lwn.net/Articles/987320/ The plugin provided some kind of screen sharing.
907.
by blueflow 2y ago
You are under siege! First sentence in article. Make sure your walls hold.
908.
by blueflow 2y ago
First paragraph reworded with alarmism removed: Climate data shows the current temperature excursion is ongoing and accelerating. Temperatures have exceeded the historical recordings by a significant margin, which increases the difficul
909.
by blueflow 2y ago
It does not matter whether there is a fire or not. Its about the communication style provoking mistrust.
910.
by blueflow 2y ago
You know whats the right thing to do? Stay with the facts and avoid hyperbole. "There is a fire in Hall B, I'm leaving the building" and people will follow you with no questions asked. Its a matter of how you communicate. I&#
911.
by blueflow 2y ago
Didn't you read? You are under siege! That is the articles wording, not mine.
912.
by blueflow 2y ago
I'm not talking about whether climate is a big problem or not, I'm talking about the writing style causing problems. That you cite the climate data makes me think you missed my point. We already agree on the data.
913.
by blueflow 2y ago
Worse. Its like someone shouting "Fire! We are dead in 5 seconds!". People who are still alive after 5 seconds will correctly figure that this is a liar and possibly also assume that there is no fire at all. Boy who cried wolf.
914.
by blueflow 2y ago
The argument relies on the insinuation i would not live in an affected area. Right now from where i sit i can see a rubble pile from USAAF/RAF bombings.
915.
by blueflow 2y ago
Implied in this: That the cloud provider can do it better than you. Not universally true nowadays.
916.
by blueflow 2y ago
> If you grew up in the US Yeah which isn't the case.
917.
by blueflow 2y ago
Certain DIY things reliably cause questioning or even an investigation by the police despite being legal.
918.
by blueflow 2y ago
Letting cops on your property is not a gamble to you?
919.
by blueflow 2y ago
As unlikely.
920.
by blueflow 2y ago
Are you one of these persons who like to have cops on their property?
921.
by blueflow 2y ago
Lets look a the costs for the wreck disposal.
922.
by blueflow 2y ago
Major annoyance in Germany: If you find a mortar or a hand grenade in your garden. Do not try bring it to the police. Transporting it is a federal crime for citizens. Leave it in place and call them.
923.
by blueflow 2y ago
How?
924.
by blueflow 2y ago
If you know it better, enlighten us.
925.
by blueflow 2y ago
That's not what it is about. If someone calls you "non-standard", you challenge them to identify these standards. If you call me wrong, at least give it hands and feets.
926.
by blueflow 2y ago
Cite your standard.
927.
by blueflow 2y ago
> Compromising it would simply be a matter of changing a few bytes in the executable, or replacing the executable with another one. The executable is part of the system that's supposed to be safe. That you have no means to modify it
928.
by blueflow 2y ago
How do you compromise a safe system?
929.
by blueflow 2y ago
You don't? Safety is not having that compromise in the first place. Like, if the code can handle all input correctly, then there is no exploit path. Regardless of whether the input comes from an attacker or not.
930.
by blueflow 2y ago
IT security is a thing at all because software safety is near non-existent.

More ›