bloodredsun

3 ms·

1.
by bloodredsun 13y ago
No, the benchmark is not pure marketing. Why would you claim that it is? Apart from Astyanax, which clients are token aware? That paper is very useful so thanks for posting the link but it has a number of issues as I see it. 1) It considers
2.
by bloodredsun 13y ago
Firstly, these sorts of applications are always going to be more read heavy so the reads are more important. Secondly, Cassandra cannot and will not be as good as something like Couchbase since the client libraries are not aware of the serv
3.
by bloodredsun 13y ago
By itself SOA doesn't do anything but it does free you up to do other things that allow you to scale like read-write separation and event driven or fan-out caching. One of the most important thing SOA does is that it quickly stops you from
4.
by bloodredsun 13y ago
What is most interesting to me is that in many ways they have reinvented Couchbase. I think that the only reason they didn't go with this technology was the financial cost for their scale was too high.
5.
by bloodredsun 13y ago
Not if you want strong consistency. Cassandra's performance sucks in comparison with the likes of MongoDb or Couchbase when reading with strong consistency since the clients have no idea of the server topology.
6.
by bloodredsun 14y ago
So Memcached then...
7.
by bloodredsun 14y ago
It's the difference between empirical research and phenomenology and one of the things that makes Psychology a) a bit woolly compared to other sciences and b) a lot more interesting.
8.
by bloodredsun 14y ago
There actually a lot of low latency stuff being done in Java now. Using the Azul Zing JVM and tricks like the Disruptor you can do some amazing stuff.
9.
by bloodredsun 14y ago
When it came out, Spring was massively different from J2EE. "J2EE Development without EJB" was mindblowing for the Enterprise community back in 2004
10.
Adopting NoSQL - prepare to get it wrong(bloodredsun.com)
1 points by bloodredsun 14y ago|0 comments