Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bliti
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
151.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
# Wrote it in code if you are interested: https://ideone.com/qF8FGh Software engineer with 5+ years of experience working with web stacks, mobile and desktop. Currently working as technical lead on startup that is not fina
152.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Big report on page linked: The two "Read more" buttons do not work on android/firefox.
153.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
They also can influence and downright force infrastructure updates to better serve the self driving vehicles.
154.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Haskell is less of an option than any of the functional languages that work on the JVM. I like Haskell, it's a language that forces you to challenge your knowledge and assumptions. But it is not in the same level as JVM langs. Maybe on
155.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Agreed. It does cause lots of verbose ceremony, as you put it (I'm stealing that). Its quite the experience using a Java IDE and noticing how much code is automatically included by pressing tab. Quite comical that Netbeans has shortcut
156.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
I've written old Java (C++ like), enterprise Java, Android Java, and currently am writing modern Java. From Android and forward there have been improvements in verbosity and boilerplate. Modern Java (8) is actually nice. Yes, the enter
157.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
The change from Rails to Go must be quite shocking. Going from such a completely framework to a barebones language is a huge step. I write Go and went from Python -> Go and it still was a bit of a jump. :)
158.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Bit off-topic here: How is the Rails market these days? It seems (personal perception of outsider) that it has been replaced by Python/JS work.
159.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
What do you mean that Java is not expressive? Care to elaborate?
160.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Simple: they lack leadership. A proper leader would focus on setting the framework for autonomous machines to operate. Without leadership, all they can do is showcase shiny greenfield projects.
161.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Yes, it is. Their inventory changed but they did not gain any revenue from it.
162.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
If only this were a forum where the right people could read about it. ;)
163.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Stars can also be ported over. You could even go one step further and create star similar to reddit's "gold". A "gold" star would contribute to the development of the project.
164.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Indeed. Though it would not take that much convincing to have those people turn gitlab into what they want and host it themselves with a container based image. Plus they could simulate the social aspect of github by using a general index of
165.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Yes, a business focused on the things that make it money. Thats the purpose and the OP is not wrong on that. What he is missing is the immense power the open source community as whole has. They can boycott github and turn it into a ghost to
166.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Autonomous operation might require updating infrastructure. That falls under the scope of government.
167.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
You can't blindly trust automated tools. They also don't replace protocol.
168.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Technical lead here: This is a tough position to have. I can't comment on the post but feel free to email me if you want to rant, vent, or talk. :)
169.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Feeling your pain right now. I have a service running in go that runs in multiple machines and this will keep me busy for the night. Worst is that I can't have a sysadmin do the whole process. Now QA has to sign off on it... It's
170.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
This is very cool. The code is very readable. I honestly expected a bit of mess. It's easy to follow and managed to learn a bit about awk. Nice job!
171.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Shoot me an email if you want me to help you interview. :)
172.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Duplicate of: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10879450
173.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Aside from the different "tipping" services, is there a way open source authors and maintainers can raise funds without doing crowdfunding? Something that let's them sell something to raise funds like when schools sell choc
174.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
People pay for convenience. AWS is just convenient. Managing your own servers requires more work. It is far far far cheaper in terms of server costs. You do have to: - Know how to maintain a server by yourself - Hire someone who can AWS rem
175.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Nice tutorial. Well written and clear.
176.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Context please. :)
177.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Very nice. I had been building the same thing after wanting something more than pelican and less than wordpress. This seems to fit perfectly. Is there a roadmap for contributing to the project? I failed to see one on github.
178.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
Pics of the car? :)
179.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
That sounds awesome. Do you have any picture albums online?
180.
▲
by
bliti
11y ago
I'm currently developing a FOSS line of robots aimed at tweens, teens, and everything in between. They are not ready yet (work gets in the way!). I know the marketplace well. Your best bet is to go with a Parallax Boe-Bot with the Ardu
More ›