blinkbat

7 ms·

121.
by blinkbat 4mo ago
...why?
122.
by blinkbat 4mo ago
The fuck
123.
by blinkbat 4mo ago
I'd focus on Go. You consider yourself an expert in all of these?
124.
by blinkbat 4mo ago
What do you currently know well in terms of software dev?
125.
by blinkbat 4mo ago
God you sound like a tool
126.
by blinkbat 4mo ago
An Ai usage guideline to help your company deal with psychosis
127.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
Learning the value of static typing
128.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
yeah. because it's an LLM. again, you are looking for an algorithm.
129.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
you mean... an algorithm? what is a "deterministic LLM"?
130.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
what do you not understand?
131.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
please, for the love of god, teach them to program and let them continue making art. they have zero reason to "learn" AI right now.
132.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
yes, it has, for juniors especially.
133.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
what else is fuckin' new.
134.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
dumb. this has nothing to do with competitive programming. simply ban AI from competitions, problem solved.
135.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
low cost and high quality generally don't mix. also "taste" is really vague. if you don't tell it what to do you can't really object when it gives you trash. secondarily, please use AI for things that save you man-h
136.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
Claude. Why? Free from job.
137.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
the two tools lenny, or whoever idk who this guy is, built -- they're cute, but they're toys to anyone who writes real software. and only the zip downloader solves a "problem" -- namely a PEBKAC one, but hey. basically t
138.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
"I am a very devout capitalist. I believe very deeply in contributing to society." sorry, but these cannot coexist. you are deceiving yourself.
139.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
This took way too long to load
140.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
Diligent MD file maintenance
141.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
29 instances of Palantir in the article. yuck!
142.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
in terms of cost, maybe. in terms of my effort, I dunno. but you're right, it's environmentally unsound. I don't usually compute with that lens, though.
143.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
your objection to them isn't that they work for a -- i think we can all agree -- pretty much despised and evil institution, but that their lives are too good? pick the right battle here.
144.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
hopefully they push back successfully. even if the most nefarious use is "we're training computer use AI", they should shell out for dedicated labs, not piggyback off the employees. gross. sidebar but I've never aspired
145.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
I honestly find myself just asking AI more and more often than actually searching pages for info. AI is also good at just parsing the shitty search results and surfacing what you ask, url-wise.
146.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
this. there's almost no fiscal incentive to even BE a teacher, let alone a well-educated one.
147.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
because engineering efficiency has nothing to do with leadership or quality control.
148.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
no, for one thing people used to actually transcribe live from talking. if you delegate to a human, you assume humanlike qualities, especially for correspondence. would you go hang out and get a beer with current-gen AI? social media is act
149.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
Is not the ultimate project of driverless cars to be, well, driverless? Granted we are not there with LLMs quite yet, but are you insisting that this is not the endgame?
150.
by blinkbat 5mo ago
Interesting that you draw the distinction of "breaking something" at code quality -- your customers almost guaranteed don't see it this way, and don't care about the code at all. So your viewpoint is team-centric, which

More ›