blibble

16 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by blibble 8mo ago

   the problem with "AI" is that by the very way it was trained: it produces plausible looking code so the "reviewing" process will be looking for the needles in the haystack when you have no understanding, or mental model
2. 212.▲
   by blibble 8mo ago

   it seems as if literally everyone associated with "AI" is a grifter, shill (sorry, "Independent Researcher"), temporarily embarrassed billionaire, or just a flat out scammer I have yet to see a counter-example
3. 213.▲
   by blibble 8mo ago

   > Arguing they had no opportunity for nuance and thus had no choice but to make false statements for their own benefit is ethical bankruptcy. absolutely and clueless managers seeing these headlines will almost certainly lead to people lo
4. 214.▲
   by blibble 8mo ago

   > I won't stand for misleading rhetoric like "it's just a Servo wrapper" when that isn't true. this level of outrage seems absent when it's misleading in the pro-"AI" direction
5. 215.▲
   by blibble 8mo ago

   the bare minimum of criticism to allow independence to be claimed?
6. 216.▲
   by blibble 8mo ago

   pushing would definitely stop the supply of interviews/freebies/speaking engagements
7. 217.▲
   by blibble 8mo ago

   grifters gonna grift
8. 218.▲
   by blibble 8mo ago

   I would not use an SSH client written by someone that feels it's OK to break the terms of the contract this way who knows what's coming next?
9. 219.▲
   by blibble 8mo ago

   > To the degree you consider this to be evidence, in the last 7 days, the authors of a PR has replied to a Greptile comment with "great catch", "good catch", etc. 9,078 times. do you have a bot to do this too?
10. 220.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > while saying folks will drop the dominant apps seems all the rage at the moment people have been saying this for decades with almost no real progress at scale. fortunately, legislation can help here start with critical national infras
11. 221.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    think we're already there aren't we? no human came out with those tariffs on penguin island
12. 222.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    I see Microslop's "AI" coding mandate is continuing to go well
13. 223.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > LLMs democratise access to coding by making the world dependent on 3, fascist adjacent, US tech companies?
14. 224.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > Then you’re going to be left behind. I really, really don't care I didn't get into programming for the money, it's just been a nice bonus
15. 225.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > If OSS didn't exist, it's highly unlikely that LLMs would have been built. would anyone want SlopHub Copilot if it had been trained exclusively on Microsoft's code? (rhetorical question)
16. 226.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > I've been so not now, then?
17. 227.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    I have a 2nd nvme in that machine for bazzite not quite there for me yet I'm afraid!
18. 228.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    it's running Microslop Windows, so it's born compromised it's an OS with constant built-in ads and spyware it would have been considered malware in the 2000s
19. 229.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    just delete the service entirely, same with defender it's great my only remaining windows PC is for games, and it's on its own vlan with its own external IP if it gets hacked: I simply don't care
20. 230.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    I actually have a slide rule that was my father's in school great for teaching logarithms
21. 231.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > How good are you at programming on a whiteboard? pretty good? I could certainly do a square root (given enough time, that one would take me a while)
22. 232.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    cut the antenna
23. 233.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    asinine logic
24. 234.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > There weren't ex post facto laws being passed during the holocaust. the argument isn't that states can't create ex-post facto laws (even though they can, see: any country with parliamentary sovereignty) it's that wh
25. 235.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > This is such a low probability scenario how is it a low probability scenario? it's happened before, in living memory (there are still people alive that survived the holocaust) and you're seeing the early stages of despotic ru
26. 236.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > I wonder how common it is for train tracks to fracture? very > And what systems are in place to actually detect this. track circuit detection would pick up most cases I would have thought
27. 237.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > Laws can not be applied retroactively. I mean, I've read stupid takes on this website but this really takes the cake despots don't care about the law
28. 238.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > world’s exemplary liberal democracy this has never been the case either, unless you're listening to USian television/movies
29. 239.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    I wouldn't bet on the holding, the cloudflare CEO didn't seem above licking the ring https://x.com/eastdakota/status/2009654937303896492 he's even using their rhetoric ("DISGUSTING")
30. 240.▲
    by blibble 8mo ago

    > Them winning absolute control over the country would be a disaster for their movement though. They'd turn to internal fighting, the entropy of victory and all that. that would be after they've finished executing the undesirab