blankley

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by blankley 5y ago

   You may well be describing me, as a Seattle resident with a blue coat and a chocolate lab who currently has an upset stomach and is in need of many walks recently. We're working on the food/diet part, but your comment inspired me
2. 2.▲
   by blankley 5y ago

   I am not sure the GP caught the article's statement that the regulatory cap on SAF is 50%, and that as a result this is arguably the most aggressive test UA could have run.
3. 3.▲
   by blankley 6y ago

   Here is a very recent (likely put out due to this as it's not a full opinion) ruling on the topic: https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/05/27/facebook-twitter-a... "Freedom Watch's First Am
4. 4.▲
   by blankley 7y ago

   In fact the impact of the 1st is substantially greater, because of the energy required for takeoff.
5. 5.▲
   by blankley 7y ago

   It's a joke! :)
6. 6.▲
   by blankley 7y ago

   That is correct.
7. 7.▲
   by blankley 9y ago

   Lol, this was exactly who I thought it would be.
8. 8.▲
   by blankley 9y ago

   The author does address this. "Some people used to argue that buybacks were a more tax-efficient means of distributing money to shareholders than dividends. But that has not been the case since 2003, when the tax rates on long-term cap