blank_2

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by blank_2 9y ago

   I think you're missing the point. I am not defending a position. I was merely pointing out the irony in trying to force a consensus. Also, there is a difference between thinking that people speaking freely is good for a society's
2. 2.▲
   by blank_2 9y ago

   If they have won, they have only won because the game has been given to them. It's clear to see that a lot of their arguments are just reactionary, as Florin_Andrei pointed out.
3. 3.▲
   by blank_2 9y ago

   We believe in freedom of expression, but let's censor/threaten whoever disagrees with us, because their opinions are harmful. We believe in gaining a consensus, but you'd better believe what we say or else.
4. 4.▲
   by blank_2 9y ago

   What current jobs don't require interaction with other humans?
5. 5.▲
   by blank_2 9y ago

   Well it could be real depending on whose definition we're going by. I remember a teacher in school giving us pictures of skyscrapers buried in water. Is that realistic? As for the cause, there is bound to be disagreement when you try t