Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
blahaj
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
blahaj
10mo ago
If ISPs would try charging per device with IPv6, NAT66 routers would just become an off the shelf product. You can just sell a black box to people that solves the issue. But more generally, I think times have changed enough for per device b
32.
▲
by
blahaj
10mo ago
People being allowed to part ways and not having to stick with their partner until death is one of the great achievements of feminism. It goes both ways. You cannot control that you will love someone forever, so you cannot promise that. Wha
33.
▲
by
blahaj
10mo ago
Two possible reasons: 1. Attention. 2. You a have a public image that includes you being married and social media is one of the main channels over which you reach the people who know you. Now you get divorced and you do not want these peopl
34.
▲
by
blahaj
10mo ago
> I share my pain publicly as a gesture of solidarity with other people, but especially women, who have been profoundly traumatized by those they thought they could love and trust. This is about her husband divorcing her. I find this to
35.
▲
by
blahaj
10mo ago
> Again, I'm old enough to remember when e.g. the ISPs were going to try to charge per device in each household. I don't really see that coming again and if it does you can just do NAT66 just like you can do NAT4.
36.
▲
RansomLook – Open Ransomware Intelligence
(ransomlook.io)
1 points
by
blahaj
10mo ago
|
0 comments
37.
▲
by
blahaj
11mo ago
Sorry, the server is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later.
38.
▲
by
blahaj
11mo ago
Were you aware of the risk you were getting yourself into when you built heheStreams? Did you take any precautions and how did you sleep at night?
39.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
> and those 5.6 million probably aren't accessing sites that require age verification. Why would you presume that? > Not every solution needs to work for 100% of people. A solution that censors large amounts of speech and culture
40.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
You might want to look into Unified Push. Although you need to use a Unified Push server that supports the differing Matrix endpoints because for some reason the Matrix devs decided to do their own thing. I wouldn't call using Unfied p
41.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
Android?
42.
▲
Efail – Plaintext recovery from OpenPGP / S/MIME email via HTML content (2018)
(efail.de)
3 points
by
blahaj
1y ago
|
0 comments
43.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
A fancy old house is more fancy than a new fancy house.
44.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
Here is a Technology Connections YouTube video about the toaster: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OfxlSG6q5Y
45.
▲
Automatic Beyond Belief
(automaticbeyondbelief.org)
3 points
by
blahaj
1y ago
|
1 comments
46.
▲
Ask HN: What is something you deeply care about?
23 points
by
blahaj
1y ago
|
42 comments
47.
▲
Ask HN: What do you spend your money on?
54 points
by
blahaj
1y ago
|
102 comments
48.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
Would you mind sharing your site?
49.
▲
Pollution of Lake Karachay
(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points
by
blahaj
1y ago
|
0 comments
50.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
> Service robots depicted in the study were the same except for the use of gray or pink colors to portray male or female genders, respectively. After receiving a menu recommendation, participants then rated the robot’s persuasiveness. So
51.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
The internet is much bigger, more diverse and complex today. You need a lot of storage to get any meaningful impact. Caching the http of Wikipedia won't get you much. You need to cache lots of YouTube videos. Or you just get them from
52.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
> You could have some hash check to prevent hijacking. The old method would be naive today. But how do you know that the cached site is up to date? How does the ISP know that? What about dynamic content? What about consistency between di
53.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
I don't think ISP caching would be a thing without https. It would bring a lot of additional complexity and resource requirements for them. I can hardly imagine that being worth it to save some bandwidth. Maybe it made sense in a world
54.
▲
Critical Program Reading (1975) [video]
(youtube.com)
34 points
by
blahaj
1y ago
|
6 comments
55.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
Just a guess, but Windows executables probably depend on a bunch of Windows APIs that are guaranteed to be there, while Linux systems are much more modular and do not have a common, let alone stable ABI interface in the userspace. You can p
56.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
You could do a GDPR request for the data they have on you. I would be curious what they save. Keep us updated if you want to.
57.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
> Unfortunately, using an advanced analytics package I’ve projected that around May 2026 the YouTube homepage will just be one video, and by September there will be no videos at all on the homepage. Doesn't exactly that already exis
58.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
I don't think things have to be impressive to be shown. A funny little idea is all you need, no matter how simple the code. Actually I find exactly that quite neat.
59.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
So it is just purposefully made to be less useful? Is that part of the joke? The rate limit still pretty surely isn't applied per IP.
60.
▲
by
blahaj
1y ago
> Rate Limit: 10 requests per minute per IP I understand that one wants some rate limiting so that others don't just use this as a backend for their own service causing every single request for their service to also create an API re
More ›