blackxored

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by blackxored 12y ago

   Others might have scratched the surface on this, but based on my network's experience and my own, don't even try the startup route, it's not worth it. Outside the US, you'll either get a) no sponsorship b) non-competitiv
2. 2.▲
   by blackxored 14y ago

   Jeeze, bad things happen (or could) to the greatest services ;) I'm late to the discussion, didn't have time to lurk around, nevertheless what I can agree the most is about gem signing. A gem is a package of software, and every single packa
3. 3.▲
   by blackxored 14y ago

   @cheald: The best answer so far, but sorry if I still find it a little incomplete as this one: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2569501/what-ruby-and-rai... . See, every developer should be able to read someone else's code, have a big pi
4. 4.▲
   by blackxored 14y ago

   I call them rockstars. ;)
5. 5.▲
   by blackxored 14y ago

   IMHO that definition is flawed. For lots of people senior != time on something. That's what usually recruiters have to back on because they don't have any other measures. I'm asking from a programmer standpoint. I remember dhh's joke on som
6. 6.▲
   Ask HN: What makes a senior Rails dev?

   14 points by blackxored 14y ago|11 comments
7. 7.▲
   A messy view, departing from MVC is the solution?(stackoverflow.com)

   4 points by blackxored 14y ago|0 comments