Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bko
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
481.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
I think people forgot how bad it was. It was much more fragmented before but instead of services it was fragmented by time. Sure you have access to Seinfeld, but you can watch one or two Seinfelds a night at 8pm and 11pm. I also remember ba
482.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
> Everyone wants an untrackable unblockable currency What are you talking about? Crypto is defined by its trackability (immutable, permission-less, verifiable ledger of every transaction in history). Please refrain from commenting on thi
483.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Read the comment again. It's not that vision is "good enough", it's that feature engineering doesn't work
484.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Most accidents happen because people are human, aren't paying attention, are inebriated, not experienced enough drivers, or reckless. It's not fair to say that vision based models will "make the same mistakes people do"
485.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Why make things more complicated than they need to be? Humans don't have lidar and we are the only intelligence that can reliably drive. Lidar just seems like feature engineering, which has proven to be a dead end in most other AI appl
486.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
There was a small group of doomers and scifi obsessed terminally online ppl that said all these things. Everyone else said its a better Google and can help them write silly haikus. Coders thought it can write a lot of boilerplate code.
487.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
I think you're overthinking it. She probably just has a lot of real people connections and drives the algo to meaningful interactions. When a ghost logs in, they don't know what to show so default to "general" spam which
488.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
I suppose at the margin they can compete. But there's also a lot of uncertainty when adding a single route can wipe out your entire business. Also private services often pick off the most profitable opportunities leaving the leftovers
489.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
> There are plenty of ways to evaluate that without charging a fee. You can track utilisation without needing to charge for it. The point is that utilization is dramatically different when something is "free". Many times the ma
490.
▲
Buses should not be "free"
(mleverything.substack.com)
4 points
by
bko
8mo ago
|
10 comments
491.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
I think the market opportunity can be a standard and eventually get labels to include your standard in addition to their traditional labeling. Figure out the variables (like shape, inseam, width, whatever else) for each article of clothing.
492.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
I think it's just numbers. There are maybe a few dozen people that see your post on /new. That's a tiny sample size, not a good proxy for how interesting the post is. You see this on Reddit as well where the same exact post g
493.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Reminds me of the quote: "Nobody Goes There Anymore, It’s Too Crowded" Some of it is "I wish things I think are cool got more upvotes". Fare enough, I've seen plenty of things I've found cool not get much atten
494.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Of course, I don't need to know everything, just if I'm hiring them I'd like to know if they have been tried and convicted of a crime, and then I can make a judgement whether it's disqualifying for my particular need.
495.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
You terms are acceptable. I'll put a sign out on my business that says "none of our employees have criminal records". Note you are free to advertise hiring prior offenders. You can also look up business ownership details and
496.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Why are only some sectors "vulnerable" and who is to make that call? How about the person cooking my food? You're over-thinking it, trying to solve for a problem that doesn't exist. No one has a "right" to work
497.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
> I think it should be removed from consideration. Not expunged or removed from record, just removed from any decision making. The timeline for this can be based on severity with things like rape and murder never expiring from considerat
498.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Im sorry but that's the equivalent of "I believe in free speech but not the right to hate speech". Its either free or not
499.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Higher price encourages more supply. Typically when you see a acute shortage, its quickly followed by a glut as supply starts coming online in an over correction.
500.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Do I understand it correctly, but people donating to Vim, presumably for the support of the software, have their donations passed along to a charity supporting children in Uganda?
501.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Exactly. A lot of this reads as a coping story about losing a job. If you were laid off, chances are you weren't valuable enough. Pure layoffs happen. But from my experience useful employees almost never get let go. Doesnt mean theyre
502.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
My issue with RentAHuman is it's marketing and branding. It's ominous, dark on purpose. Just give me a task rabbit that accepts crypto and has an API.
503.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
The AI is real. The "alignment" research that's leading the top AI companies to call for strict regulation is not real. Maybe the people working on it believe it real, but I'm hard-pressed to think that there aren't
504.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
I understand the need for a dedicated box, but any reason you shouldn't just use a server? What would someone recommend for cloud on something like Hetzner? https://www.hetzner.com/cloud/
505.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
The article basically describes the user sign up, find it empty other than marketing ploys designed by humans. It points to a bigger issue that AI has no real agency or motives. How could it? Sure if you prompt it like it was in a sci-fi no
506.
▲
by
bko
8mo ago
Is it really a bubble? The AI boom is often compared to dot com bubble but was that a bubble? Sure if you bought immediately before the crash and sold after you lost a lot of money. But if you were just consistently investing in web based c
507.
▲
by
bko
9mo ago
Hiding losses? From whom? He's the majority shareholder of both businesses. The combined company will go public and report on things like revenue, burn rate, etc. It's not financial engineering. It's a purchase. Just say &quo
508.
▲
by
bko
9mo ago
I can't imagine the world view you would have to hold to think that people who manage to command tens of billions of dollars to invest are idiots, just tripped over the money and just go off vibes.
509.
▲
by
bko
9mo ago
How can you have a conflict of interest if they're entirely separate fields? They have different interests, so where's the conflict? You don't need synergies to justify a merger. They're often used as justification as in
510.
▲
by
bko
9mo ago
More than 70% of voting shares supported the package, very close to the level of support in the original 2018 vote. This excludes Musks share. And consider that this is retroactive, meaning it's backpay. They're literally voting t
More ›