bjslade

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bjslade 8y ago

   This is the approach we’ve taken with other similar systems too. Things can go so horribly wrong underneath your containers that the concept of having only one cluster in a prod scenario and maintaining it mid-air would be unthinkable. Also
2. 2.▲
   by bjslade 8y ago

   According to the FAQ[1], they also offer 9.9.9.10, which passes client subnet at the cost of other features. [1] https://www.quad9.net/faq
3. 3.▲
   by bjslade 8y ago

   Besides response time, the next level of comparison is how well geo-DNS-based services (global load balancing, etc.) support these resolvers. AFAIK 8.8.8.8 gives decent results in most places, though I've seen suboptimal US-centric res
4. 4.▲
   by bjslade 8y ago

   I too felt that Spring Boot was a response to the simplicity of Dropwizard. I worked at a place which had two opposing java camps. One was heavily into Spring Boot, the other, Dropwizard. This might not be a fair representation of Spring Bo