bjohan

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bjohan 10y ago

   FTR, the original post was not about internet.
2. 2.▲
   by bjohan 11y ago

   I'd say Python's runtime only has a small fixed startup cost that prevent it from beating natively-compiled tools in no-op rebuilds (when no source file has changed). Some tools like tup or ninja reach insanely low times that are
3. 3.▲
   by bjohan 11y ago

   The cmake benchmarks used the make backend on linux and cygwin, and the vcbuild, msbuild and mscv-ide backend on windows/msvc. The ninja backend is indeed faster than the make one. An update to these benchmarks is needed to take it int
4. 4.▲
   by bjohan 11y ago

   I take note that I should put a date on the page! I actually ran again some of these benchmarks again over the years (last time about one years ago), on the same hardware and updated software, and results didn't change significantly. F
5. 5.▲
   by bjohan 11y ago

   Hi, I'm the author of these benchmarks, and yes, they are getting old. One of Scons' maintainers kindly asked me a few days ago to try again with current Scons version, so I've started to update and run these benchmarks again