bitsen

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bitsen 6y ago

   A physicist came up with the gear solution which was stated in the video and dismissed because the mock physicist didn’t understand why the gear or wheel solved the problem. If the gear or wheel is moving at a known rate, it can define the
2. 2.▲
   by bitsen 6y ago

   That’s the stupidest argument I’ve ever heard from someone attempting to be a physicist. The gear experiment is the simplest answer. With a gear whose diameter spans the distance between the light source and receiver, and where the speed of
3. 3.▲
   Ask HN: Non-Growth Companies with Good Benefits Hiring? (Mar 2021)

   2 points by bitsen 6y ago|0 comments
4. 4.▲
   by bitsen 6y ago

   This doesn’t seem to solve in linear time.
5. 5.▲
   by bitsen 6y ago

   Skeptical in what way?
6. 6.▲
   by bitsen 6y ago

   Yes- but because you’re doubting it, not because of the non-compete. Most contracts in-general never come into play. But you should pay attention to all of them. Don’t sign things you aren’t comfortable with, unless you know you must.
7. 7.▲
   by bitsen 6y ago

   How about APNG?
8. 8.▲
   by bitsen 6y ago

   I bet your ass that at least half of the developers reading HN don’t have caching of JS fully figured out such that when the JS changes server-side and immediately needs reloading on the client side that it does then and there instead of on