Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bitpush
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
I know Tim Cook is still the CEO, but I'm sure this was done with JT's approval. So much for Apple leaning more into hardware. They are never gonna let go for that sweet sweet recurring revenue.
92.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
If the bubble bursts why would Apple buy any AI companies?
93.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
> People do not usually type a specific alternative into the address bar. I dont get thsi argument at all. When I walk into Safeway, Coke products are kept in the front of the store and Pepsi products are at the back of the store. Coke p
94.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
> Suppose an electricity utility builds the power grid, and many businesses build their operations around that grid. Then later, the utility uses its privileged position in the grid to directly replace the businesses that depended on it.
95.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
> Previously, content would appear in Google Search, visitors would come in, and creators could earn revenue through ads, courses, or other products. But now Google can answer directly through AI Overviews, making it harder for content c
96.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
Yet, ads are super effective. Think of the many Apple ads you watch, and how enticing those devices look. Brand awareness is all that matters. Apple isnt counting on me clicking on the ad to buy the macbook
97.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
> This product was incredibly ambitious but the real miss was the market fit for what they were targeting. Why is it that Apple gets 'participation' brownie points? When a movie flops, we dont go like 'The project was incr
98.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
It matches my lived experience. None of my friends use AVP. It is gathering dust. Do you have data on the contrary that AVP is growing gangbusters (like say, Macbook Neo?)
99.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
This is such an interesting take. Thank you.
100.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
Ads dont need click to be effective.
101.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
> In the future if LLMs are more efficient and eventually commoditized, needing less infraestructure to be run (think on-device as chip efficiency increases). You speak as if this is given. Sure, LLMs are gonna get effective but frontier
102.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
Someone more skilled than me start killedbyapple.com
103.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
Now do alcohol.
104.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
> I also don't understand why people aren't more upset about the privacy issues. Because nobody is forcing you to take a Waymo? I dont think it is as hard to understand. Its like saying "You dont understand why people aren
105.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
Isnt the title a bit dramatic? I remember reading you can still install apps but you just need to click a few buttons.
106.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
Why so? Care to elaborate?
107.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
So? Every iPhone that people buy gives direct money to Apple, centralizing their power. This means, they get to dictate what apps can / cannot run on the device. So what? Nobody is forcing anyone to buy iPhones. Similarly, nobody is fo
108.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
Huh? Why are you railing against Google? Because of YouTube? How's Google Search making you addicted to screens. At this rate, you'll hate Apple for making iPhones so damn good, or Starlink for giving really good internet access.
109.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
I was told that Apple was playing 4D chess when they introduced Liquid Glass which is the design language of Vision Pro, and they were priming everyone to be a world with only VR glasses.
110.
▲
by
bitpush
5mo ago
> hey are just focused on privacy and are likely waiting for the time when local models become efficient enough to run on iPhones (which is quickly becoming a reality). This is such revisionist history. They were not strategicially waiti
111.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
Damned if you do. Damned if you dont.
112.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
This is such a narrow take, and doesnt match human progress at all. When cars were being built out, did we cry saying "Cars are flattening mobility. We could run, and jog and stroll and now with mechanized boxes, we have given our ways
113.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
It wasnt clear from the blog so I'll ask here. Where does the money go? The post refers to providing tickets to underprivileged attendees, but is that 100% or ony some part of it? Where does the rest of the money go?
114.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
Apple have had Siri for decades without any meaningful movement. If you think Apple is suddenly going to get better, that's just wishful thinking. Apple neither has the expertise nor the capability to do any of that. They'd hvae d
115.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
Apple's reality distortion field is really really strong. People love to claim Apple is doing 4D chess, when in reality Apple has certain strengths but AI is anything but. Which is why they were completely caught offguard with botched
116.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
Your linked comment argues the opposite. > Won't be surprised for the re-introduction of Xserve again but for AI. This means, Apple is gonna spend a lot of money standing up data centers (CapEx). And the article in question is essen
117.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
How do you rate Vision Pro? It was not the first one, but it was certainly the best one. Total dud though, while Meta Ray Bans are selling like hot cakes (irrespective of what you think of the company)
118.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
This is very disappointing. People look upto Apple for standing up for what is right (the FBI incident) but then it is hard to ignore all the other ones (Gold plaque for Trump Government, Chinese shenanigans ..)
119.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
I feel bad for adguard and the likes. LLMs have sucked the air out of capital and mindshare from privacy and ad-blocking, and the likes.
120.
▲
by
bitpush
6mo ago
even higher than $200? gosh, what are you doing to hit limits every day?
More ›