birkskyum

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by birkskyum 2mo ago

   @solidjs/web is already neatly separated, so there is space for other targets.
2. 2.▲
   by birkskyum 3y ago

   It depends on the project how conservative you have to be, and what to emphasize. Generally, this company is very fast moving, so waiting some months could make it significantly easier to gauge if it's a good fit.
3. 3.▲
   by birkskyum 3y ago

   It leaves frontend tooling in a great place. All these features like built-in test runners, typescript/jsx support, faster iteration loop are quite convenient. There is still work to do for both runtimes in getting a high level of supp
4. 4.▲
   by birkskyum 3y ago

   That is true. Both deno and bun runtimes are released under MIT license, and might potentially outlive the companies behind them.
5. 5.▲
   by birkskyum 3y ago

   I think deno (made by Deno Company) and bun (made by Oven) are in quite similar situations here, both controlled by companies eyeing deployment services of their respective runtimes as the main source of revenue. Node is in the OpenJS Found
6. 6.▲
   Deno vs. Bun vs. Node.js: A feature comparison(dev.hexagon.56k.guru)

   90 points by birkskyum 3y ago|55 comments