bilbo0s

27 ms·

421.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
In all honesty it wouldn't even matter. If the data brokers sell data, then even if they didn't sell it to the government, they would sell it to "PR/Lobbying Firms" who lobby the government. They would sell it to &q
422.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Because a new grad in the US costs more than a new grad in Vietnam, Hyderabad, Uruguay, or Ningbo.
423.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Most succinct answer to this general concern I've seen in months. It's business. Less dollars paid out for the same LLM content that the managers know the developers will produce in any case. Foolish to pay more for essentially th
424.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
It's both. A new grad in Asia with AI access is just as good as a new grad in the US. Only way cheaper in the long run. Where will we get experienced seniors in 20 years? Well first, will we even need theme? Will AI's be able to r
425.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
From a security perspective, you shouldn't be using anything you don't control from the bottom up. That includes Windows and Signal. Full stop. But in a pragmatic world, we can't have that level of security. You're reduc
426.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Not anymore! Only half joking. I really do think the majority of that revenue will be going away.
427.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
If that's considered high, I'm just not going to say what it costs in the Caribbean. At least where I was.
428.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Even more fundamentally, think about how much carbon running a cup of water from your faucet produces. No matter where you live, this is more carbon than an LLM prompt generates. Or, even worse God forbid, think about how much carbon is pro
429.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
I was thinking that the entire time I read HN User onlyrealcuzzo's comment. Why, on Earth, would Apple ever want to solve the problem of Apps taking up more space? That's just not good business. Way better business right now to pu
430.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
This doesn't necessarily preclude the possibility of making a model that can generate a film. It's still something they can work out. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if models we're seeing these days are not a necessary
431.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
I mean, I get what everyone's saying. But, just Devil's Advocate, what would be so terrible about software developers having to find some other line of work? We've used our software development skills to automate other people
432.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
You never know when it will start spouting it either. That kind of uncertainty in the responses landing in your interface is just not sustainable. Your money is coming from the quality of the content your system is putting out. If it's
433.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Uh, guy, it's called a bias to make money as opposed to a bias towards not making money. Being in favor of making money with the company you create is not a bad thing. It's a good thing. And Elon shoving white supremacy content in
434.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
That's the thing. I mean really, people don't want that crap turning up in their responses. Imagine if you'd started a company, got everything built, and then happened to launch on the same day Elon had his fever dream and s
435.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Sigh. Firstly, that doesn't tell us whether there is bias in data. That tells us whether or not there is bias in their data. Secondly, it tells us it can train to spot things that human rads do not train to spot. It tells us nothing
436.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Sigh. Rads can see a person's race. We look at them. That's the reason rads never train to determine race from a chest x-ray. BTW, models don't need to train that either. Because if it's important, it's recorded,
437.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
It already is, which is why rads input window/level settings.
438.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
I've been going to RSNA for over 25 years, in all that time, the best I've seen from any model presented to me was the smack the radiologist on the head and say, "you dummy, you should have seen that!" model. That is, th
439.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Medical Imaging tech entrepreneur here. Been going to RSNA for longer than you've been a radiologist. In all that time, I've never come across an AI that I felt was fit for purpose. I wholeheartedly agree with you. Many many reaso
440.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Problem is, in the EU, the secure sources of income are not becoming more shaky looking. At the same time though, in the EU, the risky stuff is becoming a bit less risky looking. The EU is clearly energized to decouple itself from US tech,
441.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Not really. There's plenty of wealth in the EU. What they don't have is an appetite for risk. You could lower taxes to zero, but you'd still not get the level of speculative investment in the US without cultivating a much lar
442.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
If the people wanted congress to rein in Trump they would not have voted the opposition out. This is very much what we wanted. And we clicked "yes" on the question at every electoral level. I understand everyone's got a littl
443.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
While the employer might lose a worker to an entrepreneurial venture, isn't this the sort of self-selection out that leads to a more engaged workforce overall? Mmmm.. I don't know man? Be careful with this line of reasoning. Som
444.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
That's a trick question. I mean, name 2 things anyone owns that aren't dumpster fires? Long time ago industrial engineers used to say, "Even Toyota has recalls." Something being a dumpster fire is so common nowadays th
445.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
You know that 20 bucks a month a lot of people pay for chatgpt? Yeah.. you tax it if the "chatgpt" is foreign.
446.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Yep. Better bet for mankind at this point is for Europe or China to take up that research mantle. (Actually, maybe best bet is for both to take up the mantle?)
447.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
The weavers don’t care. In four years there will be yet another president. Probably even from a different party the way things are going. They know the system swings back and forth like that. These people have been working that system for o
448.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Demanding other nations follow our laws is “rational”? And “natural”? Uh.. yeah.. Agree to disagree. In fact, I think our entire unhealthy fixation on minorities is irrational. But hey, obviously enough voters believe in this trump nonsense
449.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
Pretty sure what that commenter claims to be doing is illegal. At least in my state. And, he would be liable if that's what you're asking. Tesla, at no time, claimed that their vehicles should be used in that fashion.
450.
by bilbo0s 1y ago
I thought HN User burnte was being hyperbolic in the assertions that post put forth. Then I read a few articles. sigh. I mean, I guess we'll try to find competent and sane leaders again in 4 years. I don't know? There's not m

More ›