bibrye

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bibrye 5y ago

   No, software licenses apply to distribution of of software. The developers made this publicly accessible to users interacting with it remotely through a computer network, in violation of the license. What the developers consider a "rel
2. 2.▲
   by bibrye 5y ago

   It was distributed under AGPL3 to users interacting with it remotely through a computer network. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html#section13 It's not a matter of whether or not the developers meant to
3. 3.▲
   by bibrye 5y ago

   > I don't think it was intended We can speculate as to whether the developers made a mistake or not, but it was publicly accessible, putting it in violation of the licensing terms.
4. 4.▲
   by bibrye 5y ago

   It says in the article that it was publicly available
5. 5.▲
   by bibrye 5y ago

   We're facing a supply shortage and you want to eliminate the laws that are keeping tiki torches in stock?!
6. 6.▲
   by bibrye 5y ago

   My health insurance is tied to my employer. I have more to risk than being disliked by building the next e-commerce platform fo r Trump Steaks.