beta_binomial

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by beta_binomial 8y ago

   I think so. The ultimate question is who are you going to sue and who is going to sue you if something goes wrong? Imagine having to put your ML researcher on the stand and having him say "I can't say for sure that this or that
2. 2.▲
   by beta_binomial 8y ago

   There are legitimate reasons why stats wins out on interpretability. 1. Scaling is not hard 2. It is obvious to me "how to make these aggregations", but that is because I know statistics. Categories of variables treated as ra
3. 3.▲
   by beta_binomial 8y ago

   This does not make any sense to me and neither did OP's comment about NN's approximating the posterior. In fact, if p were the solution then that would simply be the maximum likelihood estimate, which would not include the p(thet