bennies4grojnd

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bennies4grojnd 4y ago

   An anonymous comment on 4chan is not evidence of anything. Come on, do you really believe this is anything other than the usual trolling that goes on over there: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FdXO_XkXgAsIMFy?format=jpg&am
2. 2.▲
   by bennies4grojnd 4y ago

   Seems highly unlikely this is a satirical protest. More probably it's just a man bringing his fetish to work and expecting everyone to comply, as is the zeitgeist of today.
3. 3.▲
   by bennies4grojnd 4y ago

   So, let's say that someone (like a user of Twitter, or a writer for the Babylon Bee) points out that Rachel Levine, a public figure, is a man. How does that actually harm him? He's in an incredibly privileged position, and indeed
4. 4.▲
   by bennies4grojnd 4y ago

   You are still deflecting.
5. 5.▲
   by bennies4grojnd 4y ago

   See, you know it doesn't really make any sense to call this hate speech, otherwise you wouldn't have deflected into accusations of trolling.
6. 6.▲
   by bennies4grojnd 4y ago

   Pointing out that a man who desires to be a woman is still really a man, is an act of speech that neither causes him harm nor dehumanizes him. It's very silly to claim that this is some type of hate.
7. 7.▲
   by bennies4grojnd 4y ago

   It was a satire on USA Today naming Levine as one of their Women Of The Year. This isn't hate speech, just social commentary on organizations giving awards and accolades reserved for women to men who want to be women.