belladoreai

9 ms·

1.
In Defense of Tokenizers(huggingface.co)
3 points by belladoreai 1y ago|0 comments
2.
by belladoreai 2y ago
classic neal.fun
3.
Milton is trapped (web LLM "game")(github.com)
1 points by belladoreai 2y ago|0 comments
4.
by belladoreai 2y ago
You can find many references by googling some variations of keywords Docker, Windows, brick
5.
by belladoreai 2y ago
"Bricking" is when your electronic device stops working, i.e. becomes a brick. Docker is known to occasionally brick Windows machines.
6.
by belladoreai 2y ago
Yep, it's super powerful. I would say that the "more secure way" is to just use ComfyUI without installing any obscure nodes from unknown developers. You can do pretty much anything using just the default nodes and the big no
7.
by belladoreai 2y ago
Well, Docker is great for this as long as you're not one of the unlucky few whose machine is bricked because of Docker. So, mostly yes, I suppose.
8.
by belladoreai 2y ago
The person who created the custom node is the same person who "hacked" it. Whether or not the account is technically owned by some unrelated civilian is not important, because there is no other activity on the account.
9.
by belladoreai 2y ago
Okay, sure. But if we have an account which has never had any legitimate activity on it ever - an account that has only ever been used to push malware - then I don't know if it matters much who is the "rightful owner" of the
10.
by belladoreai 2y ago
I have not seen a statement from Nullbulge so it's not appropriate to say that they took over the repo. The author of the repo is claiming that their repo is hacked, but this is an obvious lie, because their very first GitHub commit is
11.
by belladoreai 2y ago
It was an extension for ComfyUI, which has 37k stars on GitHub. The way ComfyUI is commonly used is that a person shares a "workflow" file, which utilizes various obscure extensions (called "custom nodes") and then the p
12.
Keylogger discovered in image generator extension(old.reddit.com)
302 points by belladoreai 2y ago|98 comments
13.
by belladoreai 2y ago
Well, I asked for evidence and nobody provided any.
14.
by belladoreai 2y ago
"The invisible spaghetti monster exists! It's just invisible so you can't see it!" Where's the evidence that there's any significant use of NSFW AI by women?
15.
by belladoreai 2y ago
This is not true at all. I'm active in multiple NSFW AI Discords and Subreddits, and looking at the type of material people engage with, almost all of it is very clearly targeted at heterosexual men. I'm not even aware of any onli
16.
by belladoreai 2y ago
I don't think I really understand your use case. My library solves the following problem: how to tokenize text in a way that is compatible with llama3. If you don't have any particular constraint (as in "tokenize text in a wa
17.
by belladoreai 2y ago
It's the best option you have if you need to work with multiple LLMs in the browser.
18.
by belladoreai 2y ago
If you need to work with multiple LLMs, you probably want to use transformers.js
19.
by belladoreai 2y ago
> "What " might be a different token than "What" but the total token count shouldn't increment, would just be a different token, right? The input string "What" (without trailing space) tokenizes into 1
20.
by belladoreai 2y ago
> I'm not sure it's working correctly, I entered the word "what" and it says "4 characters, 3 tokens", I type a space and it says "4 tokens" - shouldn't it just be 1 token? and the space shoul
21.
by belladoreai 2y ago
GitHub link: https://github.com/belladoreai/llama3-tokenizer-js
22.
Show HN: LLaMA 3 tokenizer runs in the browser(belladoreai.github.io)
10 points by belladoreai 2y ago|12 comments
23.
by belladoreai 3y ago
Can you show me one (1!) artist who makes a living wage off of crypto payments without any kind of ponzi-like speculative aspect? An artist who is just using crypto as means of payment AND actually getting paid with it. Just one example is
24.
by belladoreai 3y ago
> If an artist can’t manage to set up a crypto account—or a bank account, which requires the exact same documents—they are probably not in a position to run their own art business. The artist, sure. But once the artist goes through all t
25.
by belladoreai 3y ago
> A lot of artists already are using crypto to accept payments. Look at “crypto art” space as a whole. You're conflating collectibles, which are purchased for speculative purposes, to the kinds of art which are purchased for consump
26.
by belladoreai 3y ago
> Can you give reasons why it wouldn't besides people (which includes payers) don't want to use it? Sure! Acquiring the required paperwork and banking connections to get on crypto on/off ramps is difficult. That's one
27.
by belladoreai 3y ago
It highlights the issue that the suggested solution is a theoretic or academic solution which we theorize might work out some day, but is not currently a realistic solution for the need to provide food for artists to eat so that they could
28.
by belladoreai 3y ago
> For no reason other than people don't want to. You're living in complete fantasy land. There are many reasons people find it hard to make payments in crypto, other than "just don't want to". Again, I'm rei
29.
by belladoreai 3y ago
If you're an artist who needs to eat food in order to live, this "payment system" does not facilitate your ability to achieve that.
30.
by belladoreai 3y ago
Not sure why you're being downvoted, because your comment succinctly highlights the issues and is correct.

More ›