bel8

10 ms·

151.
by bel8 4mo ago
For open-source agents, like https://pi.dev , it is as easy as asking it to create a plugin to stop the session or ask for permission whenever the LLM is trying to execute a commit command. I believe Claude and Codex also suport
152.
by bel8 4mo ago
Nvidia GPUs aren't even the absolute SOTA for LLM inference anymore. Some labs are moving to ASICs and Huawei already have their own custom chips running DeepSeek as we speak. There's enough money and scale on the line that softwa
153.
by bel8 4mo ago
If Anthropic themselves say competition is 10 months behind, it's probably 5 or less. And you seem to think "no one uses" DeepSeek's v4, z.AI's GLM 5.2 or Xiaomi's MiMo 2.5 from their official APIs when they pr
154.
by bel8 4mo ago
That's one possibility albeit quite charitable. I'd be inclined to think the same personally if GLM 5.2 wasn't also rocking in other areas too.
155.
by bel8 4mo ago
That's possibly the worst pelican I saw from all recent LLMs. Meanwhile GLM 5.2 drew a cool self-contained fully animated SVG pelican: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jun/17/glm-52
156.
by bel8 4mo ago
The only metric that worked for me is running the same prompt 5x for each LLMs on my projects. I keep specific branches a state where they are ready to develop new features.
157.
by bel8 4mo ago
Wrong. That page is after they walked back because of the outrage. The original was on the PDF as reported in this article: > If Claude Fable stops helping you, you'll never know https://jonready.com/blog/posts&
158.
by bel8 4mo ago
if by announce you mean shove it somewhere in a pdf with hundreds of pages, yes
159.
by bel8 4mo ago
I think you are correct. OpenCode Go doesn't use DeepSeek V4 from the official API to the best of my knowledge.
160.
by bel8 4mo ago
A more fair and useful comparison would be to feed both LLMs with documentation about such niche knowledge in the contex, then ask.
161.
by bel8 4mo ago
Perhaps you read those western times as being the more expensive time windows? They are the cheaper times. I know it can be confusing. But please let me know where my math is wrong.
162.
by bel8 4mo ago
So DeepSeek v4 will cost 2x between 9:00 to 12:00 and 14:00 to 18:00, Beijing Time. This is UTC+8 so to get cheaper DeepSeek: - in London (BST / UTC+1): 11:00 to 02:00, and 05:00 to 07:00. - in NY (EDT / UTC-4): 06:00 to 21:00, an
163.
by bel8 4mo ago
Why would you say that? I use DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) and MiMo 2.5 (non Pro, because vision) to work on medium sized projects (~1mil lines of code, C#, Go, TypeScript) with great success. And that is coming from someone who used Opus 4.7 a
164.
by bel8 4mo ago
I think most of these $20/mo subscrptions will either be Apple's iCloud, Microsoft's Office 365 or Google's Drive+Office plans which already do or will offer bundled AI. I know Google gives me free Gemini AI from my Goog
165.
by bel8 4mo ago
Would you recommend those for someone with no Apple devices? I'm thinking of gifting them to someone. But they are Android/Linux user.
166.
by bel8 4mo ago
Because I would like for a future with better health. And technology is a great catalyst for that.
167.
by bel8 4mo ago
It seems people will lose their jobs AND their small business too. Small agencies won't have access to the best LLMs so their services will automatically require more time and manual labour, which makes them more expensive.
168.
by bel8 4mo ago
This makes me sad since it implies that the best LLM I will ever be allowed to use is GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.8. Anything smarter than that is deemed too risky. So much wasted potential. And why would I pay Anthropic or OpenAI once consumer hard
169.
by bel8 4mo ago
But it's quantized right? It's not the same almost-free DeepSeek you get from the API. And once the context gets large, it slows down. "up to" 150, is doing a lot of work there.
170.
by bel8 4mo ago
Note that this reserved capacity now has competition from OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Meta, Microsoft, Chinese data centers and so on, all willing to pay premium. If comapnies keep spending half a macbook neo worth of subscription on AI plans m
171.
by bel8 4mo ago
But they were forced, at least for iPhones in Europe. It's a fact. Not a feeling.
172.
by bel8 4mo ago
That's not what Grubber claimed tho. They claimed solo inventor, which Apple is not.
173.
by bel8 4mo ago
why would they cut their fat margins when customers line up to buy their products anyway?
174.
by bel8 4mo ago
GLM 5.2 is priced at 1/3 of Opus. Depending on who you ask for a napkin math. Not worth it in my opinion. You'll get 10x more value by using MiMo 2.5 or DeepSeek Flash which is what I use for most code.
175.
by bel8 4mo ago
The tech is Google's invention, popularized by OpenAI, so Anthropic should still stfu in that case.
176.
by bel8 4mo ago
I think that's one of the reasons why VSCode adds AI as coauthor by default on commits when GitHub Copilot was used. To try to tag AI commits in an attempt to help filter that out in model training. Controversial default to say the lea
177.
by bel8 4mo ago
> it's interesting when you learn in practice that sometimes an N+1 problem is actually faster as N+1 than trying to query across separate DBMS systems. This is specially visible in SQLite workflows. The roundtrip for querying a loc
178.
by bel8 4mo ago
I guess it's slightly safer than a motorbike.
179.
by bel8 4mo ago
Wow, this is sad to hear. So if I understood correctly, node is walking back from trying to run TypeScript? Pretty sad if so. I hope it's a temporary step back to leap forward, in the future.
180.
by bel8 4mo ago
Good to know. Does it also preclude features like enums?

More ›