beernet

7 ms·

61.
by beernet 7mo ago
This feels like a desperate attempt to stay relevant in a post-LLM world. They’re basically wrapping an LLM in a "professional" skin and calling it an expert review. The problem is that once you start letting an AI "expert&qu
62.
by beernet 7mo ago
Sam really fumbled the top position in a matter of months, and spectacularly so. Wow. It appears that people are much more excited by Anthropic and Google releases, and there are good reasons for that which were absolutely avoidable.
63.
by beernet 7mo ago
> I have people under me who [...] Instant red flag. You're a manager. You are managing. There is no one "under you".
64.
by beernet 7mo ago
> When they cost more to serve than they bring in, customer switching cost is vanishingly low, your competitor has revenue from other things and you don't. What? "Other things"? This is really vague. Who says competitors h
65.
by beernet 7mo ago
Sam in very particular here. This guy will say whatever for status and "power".
66.
by beernet 7mo ago
How are ~1B active users not "moat"? Might have to pull out the "Haters gonna hate" like it's 2007
67.
by beernet 7mo ago
> At this stage in the game I don’t really understand where this skepticism of the value these tools provides comes from. Fear
68.
by beernet 7mo ago
> They'll overlook the fact that the work AI tools provide only encompasses 10% of your job even if they're 100% efficient. Time will tell. As of today, there are strong indications this statement stands on weak knees. Copium i
69.
by beernet 8mo ago
> Is there someone you think _could_ interview Putin responsibly? No, and no one should, see next answer. > Implicitly being the key word here and is certainly subjective. If the body of evidence you're presenting is "would
70.
by beernet 8mo ago
Not sure WTF I read here. Just more vibe coded "products" and "blogs", as it seems. This "padded room" architecture fails because isolating the host OS does nothing to protect the user's data; if the agent
71.
by beernet 8mo ago
> That said, I'd like an example if you have something specific to point to that might change my mind This guy wanted Putin on his podcast to hear his side of the story (let that sink in) and spoke Russian to Zelensky. Willingly wan
72.
by beernet 8mo ago
While that might take it a little too far, Lex surely is a dangerous individual. On various occasions did he sympathize with the war and terror that Russia is doing in Ukraine. I do not click on any of his content because I will not support
73.
by beernet 8mo ago
So how many more LLM-generated "products" do we need to see here? This is inconsistent, with contradictory information, partly blatantly wrong and overall horrible from start to finish.
74.
by beernet 8mo ago
You might as well ask an accountant why he/she uses a calculator. I really don't think you're asking the right questions here. These questions will lead to obvious answers that you don't need to interview people for.
75.
by beernet 8mo ago
Consulting has weak margins compared to SaaS and scales poorly. Providing the interface for companies to spin up their own consultants (=Agents like Claude Code) is a superior business model in every dimension.
76.
by beernet 8mo ago
Only on HN will people still doubt what is happening right in front of their eyes. I understand that putting things into perspective is important, still, the type of downplaying we can see in the comments here is not only funny but also has
77.
by beernet 8mo ago
Can you point me to a human written program an LLM cannot write? And no, just answering with a massively large codebase does not count because this issue is temporary. Some people just hate progress.
78.
by beernet 9mo ago
Not an Apple fan at all, but damn, in the views of some of the HN community, one can only do wrong. Pathetic.
79.
by beernet 10mo ago
>> Sometimes they hallucinate. For someone speaking as you knew everything, you appear to know very little. Every LLM completion is a "hallucination", some of them just happen to be factually correct.
80.
by beernet 10mo ago
More often than not, things don't turn out too well if engineers decide what to build without tight steering from customers and/or upper management. This is exactly what it sounds like here. Tech for the purpose of tech. I underst
81.
by beernet 10mo ago
>> instead of execs telling us “you should do X”, we figure out what we think will have the most impact to our customers and work on building those features and tools What could possibly go wrong here?
82.
by beernet 11mo ago
>> Our results show that forecasting ability is highly variable as it depends on what, and how, we ask. Do we really call this "research"?
83.
by beernet 11mo ago
Did you guys even check the licence? Not sure what is "open source" about that. Open weights at the very best, yet highly restrictive
84.
by beernet 11mo ago
Nice catch. Looks like engineers tried to take care of the GTM part as well and (surprise!) messed it up. In any case, the biggest loser here is Europe once again.
85.
by beernet 11mo ago
Oh, looks like someone had to release something very quickly after Google came for their lunch. Their little 15 mins is over already for BFL as it seems.
86.
by beernet 11mo ago
Not sure what's so impressive about that. The contents of the website aren't helpful at all and very very far from "curating all the actually useful AI tools" (what does that even mean?). And the design of the website is
87.
by beernet 11mo ago
>> Hey guys, we are being completely serious. Are you really? The website doesn't appear trustworthy at all. You want my information but don't even state who you are or what you do. A bunch of x-[super duper tech company] do
88.
by beernet 11mo ago
Hard to believe that this is an official OpenAI repo, but it is indeed. This looks like the weekend project of a college freshman and adds no value compared to the existing RAG tool landscape. An interesting road to a 1T IPO...
89.
by beernet 1y ago
Nothing new to see here. If you are still surprised by model hallucinations in 2025, it might be time for you to catch up or jump on the next hype bandwagon. Also, they reacted well: > Once confirmed, we corrected the extracted grade imm
90.
by beernet 1y ago
Exactly this. This dismissal itself is a large part of the problem. The audacity, wow.

More ›