Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
beerandt
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
58 ms
·
541.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
As opposed to installing every published patch, without internal testing, whether the patch is needed/applicable, or not?
542.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
Fauci was also for banning hiv/ aids patients from public places in the 80s. Because a novel disease was thought to be more communicable, more deadly, and more of a pandemic than it really was.
543.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
Actual healthcare providers are likely contracted companies and/or workers, and not direct employee hires. Moreso for physicians and mid-levels, but sometimes nurses and techs, as well. (Although idk about the subject of this story, sp
544.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
It's the businesses choice to make healthcare a job benefit. I know we've gotten to where the practice it's common, but that doesn't make it any less of a business decision. So what happens when companies start screening
545.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
Plenty of medicines are used for multiple things. Just because something is labeled X, doesn't preclude it from also being effective at Y. I'm not claiming that ivermectin is effective or not, but there is an incentive in preventi
546.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
Part of the Israeli study showed that the viral count/load of breakthrough infections was not significantly lowered compared to non-breakthrough infections.
547.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
They do not. 3rd & inches from the 1 would indicate the chance to get a 1st down, and additional downs to score.
548.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
Pretty standard for them to call out "3rd & Goal from the 5" or, graphically, above "3rd & goal" a pop-up text with an arrow ">Ball at %Team% 5".
549.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
>all under the guise It's not a guise when other countries monopolize trade routes. It's simply a cost of doing business.
550.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
That's not really any different than referring to the law vs a law. They both work in most contexts.
551.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
No- ownership determines disposition of property, not government. For instance, in most jurisdictions, a dispute between two (claimed) property owners can only be decided by them, in full agreement, with the courts stepping in only when a s
552.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
No- it's really not, but that's irrelevant. Sacrificing your personal interests and goals because you want to be in a place with people where you fit-in is the very definition of popularity, regardless of your social rank within t
553.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
>Let's not try to whitewash history. That's what you're doing by discounting what was a fairly popular political opinion of the time. >That's just not realistic. The Soviet army relied on its productive capabilitie
554.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
One of the early arguments for a first strike was the ability to target military installations only. Due to the limitations in early US targeting ability, a US counter strike likely meant having to go with a counter-value response instead o
555.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
US -> (Short) Ton =2000 lbs ~1.1tonnes UK -> (Long) Ton =2240 lbs Metric -> Tonne = ~2205 lbs
556.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
No- those losses (less the engine idle speed) are relatively larger for electric, because alternator loss is already baked into the efficiency for ice engines.
557.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
No- electric motors generally perform better at lower speeds, gas at higher speeds. Especially so in direct comparison. Which is why hybrids often switch from electric to gas past some determined speed.
558.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
For an engine rpm yes, for a moving body, not so much. Energy in a vacuum is proportional to velocity squared, and energy required with wind drag is iirc 4th power of velocity. So even with an engine designed to be most efficient when the c
559.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
Most US states require more than 20 hours in the classroom (usually a week or two), plus 8+ hours of actual driving with a driver's education teacher, plus some number of years with a learner's permit, where driving is only allo
560.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
The inspections might differ, but most states that require vehicle inspections do so yearly. And most include an emissions test, which reduces the need for complex mechanical inspections, and largely negates differences in inspection "
561.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
>>He mentioned that he’s also a fan of spicy mustard on his eggroll, and wondered had I tried Colman’s (12).
562.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
Not especially- because generally whenever zoning is enacted, the current land owner gets to decide the initial zone of their property. And land that is already zoned can't be rezoned without the current property owners consent. So the
563.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
The land owner's incentive to be a bad vs good actor. There aren't maps of some universal truth as to what habitat is protected for what species. Many habitats aren't "known" and made protected until the endangered
564.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
The increased hardship for landowners post 1973 is fact. The endangered species act turns affected land into a liability instead of being an asset. The original response was that if they were able to enjoy the use of their land before 1973,
565.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
I don't remember nerds being the ones worried about what's socially popular and fitting in.
566.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
If it became a NWR, then the government eventually took/ acquired it from him (or his successor). The details of how that happened, whether it was their choice, and how they were compensated for it are what matter. But it sounds like h
567.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
Because the argument isn't for regulation, it's against lobbying and it's against having a government that's influenced by corporatism/ capitalism (because that's largely what lobbying is). Which pretty clearly
568.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
Saying that "but for" corporate/capitalistic influence, government would be benevolent is very much implying that countries without capitalism shouldn't have corruption.
569.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
The incentive is to kill/not-kill the animals, not necessarily protect the habitat. The only fix I can see is making it a worthwhile rational decision: incentives for reporting endangered animals that are worth more than the value in d
570.
▲
by
beerandt
5y ago
I only speculated/generalized because that situation has happened, thousands of times, just not with the interesting backstory. Landowner discovers he has an endangered species, reports it, gets rewarded by having his property restrict
More ›