beepboopbeep

15 ms·

91.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
100% I've seen the same thing. But they think they're all brilliant masters of the universe. Frightening when you think on how common place that is in the industry. That said, I do believe that the larger firms have begun to evolv
92.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
Your opinion doesn't make policy.
93.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
This is an absurd slippery slope falacy.
94.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
The poor want money without the culture, while the rich want culture without the poverty. When you're rich enough to buy what you need, you do. When you're poor enough to need, you make do. Culture and creativity arise from the fr
95.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
There definitely is a down vote button. It's the negative sign next to the [username]|[time] You're thinking of this in too black or white. What if an author I follow posts something dumb? Do I then unfollow them? Why is it too mu
96.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
Or I could just click a dislike button and move on with my life, as is happening with my own posts
97.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
According to that logic I should follow every single person I agree with as well. Which is silly, and I should not be encouraged to block every person I disagree with. The like button exists for a reason. It's a simple interactive butt
98.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
Just add a damn dislike button. Don't let obnoxious ideas go without punishment.
99.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
Just want to point out that the prosthelytizers of DE shaving tend to be a self selecting group of those who happend to have great success with their particular beards and that razor. There are many, many, different beards though. I tried D
100.
by beepboopbeep 7y ago
I'm happy to see that the usual comments of "I remember tripping at a festival/college and it was rad!" Are being replaced by medicinal based commentary.
101.
by beepboopbeep 8y ago
But is the assault not called for? Has huawei not don't weird/shady/illegal things? I'm not questioning your statement on AT&T, I happen to agree, but is the topic at hand not the actions and history of Huawei?
102.
by beepboopbeep 8y ago
Yes, they'll blow lots of money on renovations while ignoring work-from-home demands of employees. Meanwhile, the folks in charge of dredging their internal systems up from the 90's are working on skeleton crews. It's just mi
103.
by beepboopbeep 8y ago
The text on the site alone is a red flag. It might as well be Latin gibberish. And the "awards" aren't linked to anything. Some of them are just silly, like this one: https://resecurity.com/wp-content/upl
104.
by beepboopbeep 8y ago
5?! Pardon the wholly inappropriate comment, your innards must shine like polished steel.
105.
by beepboopbeep 8y ago
Being on facebook is like sticking your pant leg in a briarbush. It's random bits of window and content that just tries to cling to you. Nothing about it is fun or engaging. Instagram is quickly going that path as well. That said, any
106.
by beepboopbeep 8y ago
Has no one here hit a dear before?
107.
by beepboopbeep 8y ago
to say that they are equally as bad is, actually, dishonest.
108.
by beepboopbeep 8y ago
The article is trying to not-so-subtly prop up the conservative meme that google is a leftist empire out to censor conservative voices.
109.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
I was just thinking about this the other day. Large familial units have pretty much been the modus operandi of humanity since the beginning. It's not just adults taking care of kids, the kids take care of the kids also. Each generation
110.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
Sounds like poor planning and oversight then. Tax revenue levels certainly aren't an indicator of competence of the local and state government.
111.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
I know 2 data points do not make a pattern, but it's really weird that both replies to my comment are in a similar vein from usernames that appear to be variants of "Tom P"
112.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
While I have an opinion for your question, you seem oddly driven to change topics. So I'll kindly decline to answer.
113.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
I just don't know how else to tell you that these things are all very bad. They, to me, should appear bad at face value. We clearly differ in the perception of the world at a fundamental level.
114.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
The purposeful gutting/disorganization of major federal agencies and operations, the discrediting of the white house's statements, the undermining of existing federal law (see: explicitly sabotaging the ACA), then there's, of
115.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
Why CNN?
116.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
Ya this seems arbitrary at best and vindictive at worst. And whom shall they sell CNN to? Rupert Murdoch? (accompanied by a sudden deafening silence from the DOJ on mega mergers)
117.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
uh, or you could be a reasonable human being and weigh the risks that you're willing to endure for a given return on an investment...
118.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
>before we gut the Bill of Rights. What are you talking about?
119.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
>Yet the "dossier" that was paid for via a quid pro quo arrangement is not of concern? IMHO both are very concerning. Paid to an american firm by both the GOP and Dem campaigns. That is not the same as a quid pro quo with the i
120.
by beepboopbeep 9y ago
>There hasn't been any evidence of anything other than minor mischief. The son of the candidate openly admitted to meeting with Russian foreign agents in order to secure a quid pro quo agreement (and that doesn't even touch on

More ›