Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
beeboobaa
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
301.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
While Google is waging war against adblockers on YouTube they are once again showing they absolutely cannot be trusted with the responsibility of showing safe ads. That, and them showing war videos in ads to little kids.
302.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
It is, though. The steam page tells me I'm buying a game, not renting or licensing it.
303.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
Sounds like victim blaming.
304.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
That's fraud. Blocking ads isn't.
305.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
I'm so sick and tired of techies infantilizing the rest of the population. It started with making apps "accessible" but the result is that they've dumbed down an entire generation by limiting them to their locked down mo
306.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
Absolutely not. I only watch a handful of videos a month and don't care about their music streaming. $12/month is an absolute ripoff. No way my handful of ad views produces more than $1, MAYBE $2.
307.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
I don't know how it works in detail, all I know is that they once again banned players for something completely beneign, all the while pretending that they never make mistakes.
308.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
You're comparing a charge for an one time event versus something that is purported to be perpetual.
309.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
I'm not a murican but I assume that over there it's also legal to drive your car on your property without a license. How can they strip you of that right?
310.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
It's not about wanting to cheat, it's about being able to do things such as updating your graphics driver without being branded a cheater and having the things you paid for being taken away
311.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
Neither is owning a phone? What is your point?
312.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
Paid VAC protected games exist, and arguably it's worsewl with counter strike: you pay for cosmetics that become worthless one Valve has decided they do not like what you install on your computer.
313.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
That's the same argument as "but think of the children". Are you also fine with CSAM scanning tools being installed everywhere? It's okay to have a bunch of false positives that potentially ruin people just in case you c
314.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
No, I don't even play these games competitively. I just care about being able to run what I want on my devices without some company telling me I don't get to do that or else And admittedly their grandstanding of "VAC is alway
315.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
"You can play it except for the game modes people actually care about" Do you also think it's okay if a car that you bought prevents you from driving it, but oh don't worry, it's okay because you're still allow
316.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
The average user is not capable to agree or disagree with such a requirement. Look at this very post: all they did was enable a feature of their GPU driver. And they got branded a cheater by Valve. Sure, Valve promises to make it right this
317.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
Never understood how Valve's VAC bans are even legal. You pay for a game, Valve decides they don't like your computer and they take away your ability to play that and other games that you paid for without refunding you. Worse, the
318.
▲
by
beeboobaa
3y ago
Besides the fact that apple demands far too much money from developers to "access their platform" they have also failed to deliver cross platform tooling so you need some fiddly Mac machines to be able to even build for their plat